Balancing public trust and creditor primacy in public-private partnership concessions under India’s insolvency framework

India’s insolvency framework seeks the timely resolution of financially distressed corporate debtors while preserving their value as going concerns. Public-private partnerships, however, present distinctive challenges because infrastructure development and service delivery depend on concession agreements that combine commercial rights with public responsibilities. Conflict arises when a concessionaire enters corporate insolvency resolution and the granting authority seeks to terminate the concession. This study examines how Indian insolvency law can reconcile creditor protection, preservation of enterprise value, and the state’s continuing responsibility for public infrastructure and services. Using doctrinal and comparative legal methods, the analysis examines the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, relevant constitutional principles, and Supreme Court jurisprudence concerning contractual termination during corporate insolvency. It also draws comparatively on the United Kingdom’s special administration regimes and the United States’ Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy framework. The analysis identifies four principal areas of friction: the legal characterisation of concession rights, the interaction between termination powers and the insolvency moratorium, the potential erosion of going-concern value, and the treatment of termination compensation within creditor priorities. To address these problems, the study proposes a specialised public infrastructure insolvency framework incorporating a dual-threshold termination test, mandatory step-in rights for financial creditors, and ring-fenced termination compensation. These reforms seek to provide a more predictable balance between public-service continuity and creditor interests while strengthening legal certainty for granting authorities, concessionaires, creditors, and prospective resolution applicants involved in financially distressed public-private partnership projects in India.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62452/8ybqtx02
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing public trust and creditor primacy in public-private partnership concessions under India’s insolvency framework

B Sandhya Rani, N. Goyal, Madhulika Singh
Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias Aplicadas
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Balancing public trust and creditor primacy in public-private partnership concessions under India’s insolvency framework

B Sandhya Rani, N. Goyal, Madhulika Singh
article en

Abstract

India’s insolvency framework seeks the timely resolution of financially distressed corporate debtors while preserving their value as going concerns. Public-private partnerships, however, present distinctive challenges because infrastructure development and service delivery depend on concession agreements that combine commercial rights with public responsibilities. Conflict arises when a concessionaire enters corporate insolvency resolution and the granting authority seeks to terminate the concession. This study examines how Indian insolvency law can reconcile creditor protection, preservation of enterprise value, and the state’s continuing responsibility for public infrastructure and services. Using doctrinal and comparative legal methods, the analysis examines the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, relevant constitutional principles, and Supreme Court jurisprudence concerning contractual termination during corporate insolvency. It also draws comparatively on the United Kingdom’s special administration regimes and the United States’ Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy framework. The analysis identifies four principal areas of friction: the legal characterisation of concession rights, the interaction between termination powers and the insolvency moratorium, the potential erosion of going-concern value, and the treatment of termination compensation within creditor priorities. To address these problems, the study proposes a specialised public infrastructure insolvency framework incorporating a dual-threshold termination test, mandatory step-in rights for financial creditors, and ring-fenced termination compensation. These reforms seek to provide a more predictable balance between public-service continuity and creditor interests while strengthening legal certainty for granting authorities, concessionaires, creditors, and prospective resolution applicants involved in financially distressed public-private partnership projects in India.

Revista Metropolitana de Ciencias AplicadasVol. 9(6)
Karnavati University (IN), Jai Narain Vyas University (IN), University of Rajasthan (IN)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon