Evidence-Grounded Decision Support for AI-Assisted Literary Interpretation: A 90-Response Exploratory Pilot Using Kashmiri Texts

The application of large language models (LLMs) in the teaching of the humanities and in digital heritage and literary research presents a human decision-making challenge: when is a fluent interpretation adequate, and when does it need specialist verification? This exploratory pilot investigates a source-grounded assessment framework to support human review decisions for five selected historical English-language textual units from Kashmiri literature that have been presented in English over a historical period of time. The balanced design comprised two AI interfaces, three prompting conditions and three response-generation runs per text–interface–condition combination. Two literary questions were answered for each response. The evaluation of textual grounding, cultural specificity, literary form, interpretive ambiguity and translation awareness was carried out in one masked-identity, AI-assisted scoring pass. The mean scores for the provisional responses were 81.48/100 for Claude-assigned responses and 71.26/100 for Gemini-assigned responses, with the highest descriptive mean scores being achieved for prompts with relevant context for both interfaces. The differences were focused on literary form and ambiguity, while translation awareness was restricted. The study lacks independent expert ratings, validated acceptance thresholds, causal treatment estimates and independently verified fixed-model comparisons. Qualitative comparisons identified risks involving misattributed intention, unsupported historical generalization and unattributed religious terminology. The main contribution is a proposed human-in-the-loop decision-support workflow, linking textual evidence, claim-level uncertainty and specialist verification to responsible reuse decisions. These findings support an exploratory assessment framework; they do not establish definitive literary judgments or a validated decision-support system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer and decision making.
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1922/comdem.v3i6s.18786
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-Grounded Decision Support for AI-Assisted Literary Interpretation: A 90-Response Exploratory Pilot Using Kashmiri Texts

Nigam Dave, Pranshu Joshi
Computer and decision making.
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Evidence-Grounded Decision Support for AI-Assisted Literary Interpretation: A 90-Response Exploratory Pilot Using Kashmiri Texts

Nigam Dave, Pranshu Joshi
article en

Abstract

The application of large language models (LLMs) in the teaching of the humanities and in digital heritage and literary research presents a human decision-making challenge: when is a fluent interpretation adequate, and when does it need specialist verification? This exploratory pilot investigates a source-grounded assessment framework to support human review decisions for five selected historical English-language textual units from Kashmiri literature that have been presented in English over a historical period of time. The balanced design comprised two AI interfaces, three prompting conditions and three response-generation runs per text–interface–condition combination. Two literary questions were answered for each response. The evaluation of textual grounding, cultural specificity, literary form, interpretive ambiguity and translation awareness was carried out in one masked-identity, AI-assisted scoring pass. The mean scores for the provisional responses were 81.48/100 for Claude-assigned responses and 71.26/100 for Gemini-assigned responses, with the highest descriptive mean scores being achieved for prompts with relevant context for both interfaces. The differences were focused on literary form and ambiguity, while translation awareness was restricted. The study lacks independent expert ratings, validated acceptance thresholds, causal treatment estimates and independently verified fixed-model comparisons. Qualitative comparisons identified risks involving misattributed intention, unsupported historical generalization and unattributed religious terminology. The main contribution is a proposed human-in-the-loop decision-support workflow, linking textual evidence, claim-level uncertainty and specialist verification to responsible reuse decisions. These findings support an exploratory assessment framework; they do not establish definitive literary judgments or a validated decision-support system.

Computer and decision making.
Pandit Deendayal Energy University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Evidence-Grounded Decision Support for AI-Assisted Literary Interpretation: A 90-Response Exploratory Pilot Using Kashmiri Texts — Nigam Dave, Pranshu Joshi · Computer and decision making. (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS