Acute stress attenuates the coupling between gastric interoception and snack consumption

A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying eating behavior is crucial for preventing and treating obesity and eating-related disorders. Gastric interoceptive sensitivity, defined as the perceptual threshold of satiation and fullness, is a key physiological marker of meal termination. Although stress is known to influence eating behavior, its impact on the relationship between gastric interoception and food intake remains insufficiently understood. This study behaviorally examined the association between gastric interoceptive sensitivity and snack consumption under high- and low-stress conditions, while accounting for individual eating traits. In 61 fasted adults, gastric interoceptive sensitivity and self-determined snack intake were assessed following both a stress and a control task across four laboratory sessions. Gastric interoceptive sensitivity was measured using a novel paradigm, the Magic Table (MT). Multilevel analyses showed that both satiation and fullness perception thresholds were significantly associated with snack consumption. Under stress, however, only the fullness threshold remained significantly related to snack intake. Higher emotional and restrained eating scores were linked to a weaker association between gastric interoceptive sensitivity and snack intake, whereas higher uncontrolled eating scores showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that satiation and fullness signals guide snack termination under low stress, whereas acute stress and certain eating styles weaken the coupling between gastric signals and behavioral regulation. Dysregulated eating may therefore reflect impaired integration of interoceptive input into decision-making, particularly under stress. Beyond enhancing interoceptive sensitivity, studies on interoceptive-focused interventions may benefit from strengthening the integration of satiation signals into eating decisions, especially in stressful contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Appetite
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2026.108806
Primary Topic
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acute stress attenuates the coupling between gastric interoception and snack consumption

André Schulz, Olga Pollatos, Miriam Kipping, Rafaela Gjini
1 links
Appetite
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
article

Acute stress attenuates the coupling between gastric interoception and snack consumption

André Schulz, Olga Pollatos, Miriam Kipping, Rafaela Gjini
article en

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying eating behavior is crucial for preventing and treating obesity and eating-related disorders. Gastric interoceptive sensitivity, defined as the perceptual threshold of satiation and fullness, is a key physiological marker of meal termination. Although stress is known to influence eating behavior, its impact on the relationship between gastric interoception and food intake remains insufficiently understood. This study behaviorally examined the association between gastric interoceptive sensitivity and snack consumption under high- and low-stress conditions, while accounting for individual eating traits. In 61 fasted adults, gastric interoceptive sensitivity and self-determined snack intake were assessed following both a stress and a control task across four laboratory sessions. Gastric interoceptive sensitivity was measured using a novel paradigm, the Magic Table (MT). Multilevel analyses showed that both satiation and fullness perception thresholds were significantly associated with snack consumption. Under stress, however, only the fullness threshold remained significantly related to snack intake. Higher emotional and restrained eating scores were linked to a weaker association between gastric interoceptive sensitivity and snack intake, whereas higher uncontrolled eating scores showed the opposite pattern. These findings suggest that satiation and fullness signals guide snack termination under low stress, whereas acute stress and certain eating styles weaken the coupling between gastric signals and behavioral regulation. Dysregulated eating may therefore reflect impaired integration of interoceptive input into decision-making, particularly under stress. Beyond enhancing interoceptive sensitivity, studies on interoceptive-focused interventions may benefit from strengthening the integration of satiation signals into eating decisions, especially in stressful contexts.

AppetiteVol. 229
University of Luxembourg (LU), Universität Ulm (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon