Auricular point acupressure for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is common and persistent, with limited management options. This trial primarily examines whether auricular point acupressure (APA) improved CIPN outcomes versus usual care; a secondary pragmatic aim compared in-person mobile support (mAPA) with virtual (vAPA) delivery. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors with CIPN were randomized to mAPA (n = 80), vAPA (n = 75), or usual care (n = 72). Both APA arms received the same 4-week auricular point protocol; mAPA received in-person seed placement, and vAPA received video instruction for self-placement, with one coaching session for both. Usual care was standard oncologic and supportive care with no study-delivered APA. Primary outcome was a ≥20% reduction from baseline in an individualized composite outcome (ICO); each participant's highest-rated symptom-by-location item at baseline. Secondary outcomes were neuropathy interference, functional status, and quality of life. Intention-to-treat analyses used generalized estimating equations with multiple imputation and delta-adjusted sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: At Week 1, both APA arms exceeded usual care (mAPA OR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.27-5.33; vAPA OR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.48-7.01; p < 0.01). The mAPA advantage persisted at Week 2 (OR = 2.49, p = 0.02). For neuropathy interference, mAPA benefits exceeded usual care every week (OR = 3.29-4.28, all p < 0.01). Among exploratory domains, anxiety, depression, and pain interference improved only in mAPA. CONCLUSION: APA produced a short-lived advantage in CIPN severity and more consistent improvement in interference, specifically with in-person delivery. Findings are preliminary: no blinding or attention control, differential attrition (52% vAPA versus 96% usual care), and exploratory quality-of-life analyses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT04920097 registered on 3 June 2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Supportive Care in Cancer
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-026-11373-8
Primary Topic
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Auricular point acupressure for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial

Putao Cen, Katrina R. Hamilton, Eileen Danaher Hacker, Neha Maithel et al.
2 links
Supportive Care in Cancer
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
article

Auricular point acupressure for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: a randomized controlled trial

Putao Cen, Katrina R. Hamilton, Eileen Danaher Hacker, Neha Maithel, Chitchanok Benjasirisan, Salahadin Abdi, Anneliese O Gonzalez, Yannuo Jiang, Constance Johnson, Jennifer Kawi, Nada Lukkahatai, Thomas J. Smith, Claudia M. Campbell, Julie Haewon Rowe, Syed Hasan Raza Jafri, Haris Iqbal Sair, Johannes Thrul, Lavanya Palavalli Parsons, Jingyu Zhang, Jessica Jones, Yumin Cho, Hulin Wu, Hongyu Wang
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is common and persistent, with limited management options. This trial primarily examines whether auricular point acupressure (APA) improved CIPN outcomes versus usual care; a secondary pragmatic aim compared in-person mobile support (mAPA) with virtual (vAPA) delivery. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-seven cancer survivors with CIPN were randomized to mAPA (n = 80), vAPA (n = 75), or usual care (n = 72). Both APA arms received the same 4-week auricular point protocol; mAPA received in-person seed placement, and vAPA received video instruction for self-placement, with one coaching session for both. Usual care was standard oncologic and supportive care with no study-delivered APA. Primary outcome was a ≥20% reduction from baseline in an individualized composite outcome (ICO); each participant's highest-rated symptom-by-location item at baseline. Secondary outcomes were neuropathy interference, functional status, and quality of life. Intention-to-treat analyses used generalized estimating equations with multiple imputation and delta-adjusted sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: At Week 1, both APA arms exceeded usual care (mAPA OR = 2.60, 95% CI 1.27-5.33; vAPA OR = 3.22; 95% CI 1.48-7.01; p < 0.01). The mAPA advantage persisted at Week 2 (OR = 2.49, p = 0.02). For neuropathy interference, mAPA benefits exceeded usual care every week (OR = 3.29-4.28, all p < 0.01). Among exploratory domains, anxiety, depression, and pain interference improved only in mAPA. CONCLUSION: APA produced a short-lived advantage in CIPN severity and more consistent improvement in interference, specifically with in-person delivery. Findings are preliminary: no blinding or attention control, differential attrition (52% vAPA versus 96% usual care), and exploratory quality-of-life analyses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, ID NCT04920097 registered on 3 June 2021.

Supportive Care in CancerVol. 34(11)
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), Mahidol University (TH), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Ohio University (US), Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon