Efficacy and safety of brachial plexus block versus local infiltration anesthesia for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To determine whether brachial plexus block (BPB) or local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) provides better efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in adults undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for dialysis access. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data for clinical trials comparing LIA and BPB during PTA for dialysis access. Two independent reviewers performed risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Random-effect models and fixed-effect models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. We enrolled 912 patients across eight trials (four cohort studies and four randomized controlled trials). BPB was associated with significantly lower intraoperative (MD= -2.99, P < 0.01) and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (MD= -2.47, P < 0.05), higher patient satisfaction scores (SMD = 0.82, P < 0.05, though this finding was not robust in sensitivity analyses), and improved 6- (OR = 3.07, P < 0.05) and 12-month primary-assisted patency rates (OR = 2.86, P < 0.05). There was no difference in 3- (OR = 1.08, P > 0.05), 6- (OR = 1.12, P > 0.05), and 12-month primary patency rates (OR = 1.15, P > 0.05) and surgical time (MD= -1.09, P > 0.05) between both anesthetic modalities. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events between the two groups (5.63% vs. 7.25%, P = 0.53). Compared with LIA, BPB was associated with better pain control and higher patient satisfaction, though the latter finding was not robust in sensitivity analyses. An exploratory association with improved primary-assisted patency was also observed, but this finding is observational and should be interpreted with caution. Both modalities showed comparable primary patency and surgical time. However, the generalizability may be limited to East Asian populations. PROSPERO (CRD42023429884).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04375-w
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy and safety of brachial plexus block versus local infiltration anesthesia for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mingxin Chang, Tianying Chang, 张洪宝, Xiaodan Wang et al.
3 links
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Efficacy and safety of brachial plexus block versus local infiltration anesthesia for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in dialysis access: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mingxin Chang, Tianying Chang, 张洪宝, Xiaodan Wang, Xing Liao, Yingzi Cui, Dayan Wang
article en

Abstract

To determine whether brachial plexus block (BPB) or local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) provides better efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction in adults undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for dialysis access. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang Data for clinical trials comparing LIA and BPB during PTA for dialysis access. Two independent reviewers performed risk of bias assessment and data extraction. Random-effect models and fixed-effect models were used to calculate pooled effect size estimates. We enrolled 912 patients across eight trials (four cohort studies and four randomized controlled trials). BPB was associated with significantly lower intraoperative (MD= -2.99, P < 0.01) and postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores (MD= -2.47, P < 0.05), higher patient satisfaction scores (SMD = 0.82, P < 0.05, though this finding was not robust in sensitivity analyses), and improved 6- (OR = 3.07, P < 0.05) and 12-month primary-assisted patency rates (OR = 2.86, P < 0.05). There was no difference in 3- (OR = 1.08, P > 0.05), 6- (OR = 1.12, P > 0.05), and 12-month primary patency rates (OR = 1.15, P > 0.05) and surgical time (MD= -1.09, P > 0.05) between both anesthetic modalities. There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events between the two groups (5.63% vs. 7.25%, P = 0.53). Compared with LIA, BPB was associated with better pain control and higher patient satisfaction, though the latter finding was not robust in sensitivity analyses. An exploratory association with improved primary-assisted patency was also observed, but this finding is observational and should be interpreted with caution. Both modalities showed comparable primary patency and surgical time. However, the generalizability may be limited to East Asian populations. PROSPERO (CRD42023429884).

BMC Anesthesiology
Changchun University of Chinese Medicine (CN), The Affiliated Hospital to Changchun University of Chinese Medicine (CN), China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon