Who Benefits from Citizenship? Varying Effects of Naturalization Decisions in the Early-Twentieth-Century United States

Citizenship acquisition is widely viewed as a mechanism for improving economic outcomes, yet little is known about whether its benefits are distributed evenly. This article examines the varied returns to naturalization in the early-twentieth-century United States, assessing whether naturalization uniformly benefits all immigrants or is especially impactful for those already positioned to profit. Using naturalization records from New York City’s Southern District in the early 1900s, we construct a novel historical dataset for 1,947 immigrants who declared their intent to naturalize. By linking these records to U.S. census data from 1920, 1930, and 1940, we are able to observe immigrants’ characteristics at the point when they make naturalization decisions and to track their outcomes over time. Our findings reveal that immigrants who completed the naturalization process attained significantly higher occupational status than those who initiated but did not complete naturalization. In addition, citizenship is most transformative for those facing the greatest disadvantages. Additional analyses corroborate these findings in linked full-count census data for the entire United States. Citizenship confers occupational advantages not only through formal rights but as a resource that enables claims-making in the labor market, with greater returns to less advantaged immigrants.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Sociological Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031224261489725
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Benefits from Citizenship? Varying Effects of Naturalization Decisions in the Early-Twentieth-Century United States

Nathan Isaac Hoffmann, Peter Catron, Mingze Li
American Sociological Review
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Who Benefits from Citizenship? Varying Effects of Naturalization Decisions in the Early-Twentieth-Century United States

Nathan Isaac Hoffmann, Peter Catron, Mingze Li
article en

Abstract

Citizenship acquisition is widely viewed as a mechanism for improving economic outcomes, yet little is known about whether its benefits are distributed evenly. This article examines the varied returns to naturalization in the early-twentieth-century United States, assessing whether naturalization uniformly benefits all immigrants or is especially impactful for those already positioned to profit. Using naturalization records from New York City’s Southern District in the early 1900s, we construct a novel historical dataset for 1,947 immigrants who declared their intent to naturalize. By linking these records to U.S. census data from 1920, 1930, and 1940, we are able to observe immigrants’ characteristics at the point when they make naturalization decisions and to track their outcomes over time. Our findings reveal that immigrants who completed the naturalization process attained significantly higher occupational status than those who initiated but did not complete naturalization. In addition, citizenship is most transformative for those facing the greatest disadvantages. Additional analyses corroborate these findings in linked full-count census data for the entire United States. Citizenship confers occupational advantages not only through formal rights but as a resource that enables claims-making in the labor market, with greater returns to less advantaged immigrants.

American Sociological Review
Emory University (US), University of Washington (US)
Reduced inequalities, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Who Benefits from Citizenship? Varying Effects of Naturalization Decisions in the Early-Twentieth-Century United States — Nathan Isaac Hoffmann, Peter Catron, et al. · American Sociological Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS