Evaluating AI Systems Before Deployment

This paper examines why evaluating AI systems before deployment is essential for understanding their reliability, limitations, and potential failure modes. Strong benchmark performance does not necessarily demonstrate that an AI system will behave reliably in unfamiliar, adversarial, or changing environments. The paper explores six areas of AI evaluation: the limitations of benchmark performance, deceptive or misleading behavior, system-level failure modes, adversarial testing, uncertainty handling, and post-deployment monitoring. It emphasizes that evaluations should examine the complete system, including its tools, permissions, data sources, and operating environment. Evaluation results should be treated as evidence rather than guarantees, and deployment decisions should account for unresolved risks and the potential consequences of system failure. Publication status: Unpublished preprint. Not peer-reviewed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23808285
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Evaluating AI Systems Before Deployment

Meet Nitin Patil
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Evaluating AI Systems Before Deployment

Meet Nitin Patil
preprint en

Abstract

This paper examines why evaluating AI systems before deployment is essential for understanding their reliability, limitations, and potential failure modes. Strong benchmark performance does not necessarily demonstrate that an AI system will behave reliably in unfamiliar, adversarial, or changing environments. The paper explores six areas of AI evaluation: the limitations of benchmark performance, deceptive or misleading behavior, system-level failure modes, adversarial testing, uncertainty handling, and post-deployment monitoring. It emphasizes that evaluations should examine the complete system, including its tools, permissions, data sources, and operating environment. Evaluation results should be treated as evidence rather than guarantees, and deployment decisions should account for unresolved risks and the potential consequences of system failure. Publication status: Unpublished preprint. Not peer-reviewed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon