WOUND MANAGEMENT IN AYURVEDA: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CLASSICAL PRINCIPLES, THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AND CONTEMPORARY EVIDENCE

Wound care occupies a central position in the surgical tradition of Ayurveda, and the Sushruta Saṃhita, the foundational text of classical Indian surgery, devotes sustained attention to the definition, classification, examination and treatment of the Vrana (wound). This critical review examines the classical framework of wound management in Ayurveda and evaluates its relationship to contemporary wound-healing science and clinical evidence. The review synthesizes classical textual sources, principally the Sushruta Saṃhita in the Bhishagratna translation, with peer-reviewed experimental and clinical studies identified through targeted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and PubMed Central records. The classical system rests on a staged, individualized approach: cleansing (Vrana-Sodhana), promotion of healing Vrana-Ropana), and an enumerated repertoire of sixty therapeutic measures (Sashṭi Upakrama), supported by a detailed classification of wounds by origin (Nija and Agantu), by Dosha predominance, and by the distinction between clean (suddha) and vitiated (Dushta) wounds. Contemporary studies, including randomized trials of Panchavalkala preparations, Manjisthadi Ghrita, honey and the medicated seton (Ksharasutra), report promising results, yet the evidence base remains limited by small samples, single-arm designs, heterogeneous outcome measures and inconsistent product standardization. The review critically appraises these limitations, distinguishes classical textual claims from experimental and clinical evidence, and identifies priorities for future research, including adequately powered randomized trials, standardized formulations, validated outcome reporting and translational studies. Although direct equivalence between Ayurvedic categories and modern wound classifications should not be assumed, several classical principles, including staged wound preparation, infection control, and systemic and dietary support, show meaningful conceptual convergence with contemporary wound care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23799572
Primary Topic
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WOUND MANAGEMENT IN AYURVEDA: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CLASSICAL PRINCIPLES, THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AND CONTEMPORARY EVIDENCE

Rajesh Kumar Soni, Dr. Chhagan Lal, Prof. Mahesh Dixit, Dr. Hari Shankar Paliwal
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
article

WOUND MANAGEMENT IN AYURVEDA: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF CLASSICAL PRINCIPLES, THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES AND CONTEMPORARY EVIDENCE

Rajesh Kumar Soni, Dr. Chhagan Lal, Prof. Mahesh Dixit, Dr. Hari Shankar Paliwal
article en

Abstract

Wound care occupies a central position in the surgical tradition of Ayurveda, and the Sushruta Saṃhita, the foundational text of classical Indian surgery, devotes sustained attention to the definition, classification, examination and treatment of the Vrana (wound). This critical review examines the classical framework of wound management in Ayurveda and evaluates its relationship to contemporary wound-healing science and clinical evidence. The review synthesizes classical textual sources, principally the Sushruta Saṃhita in the Bhishagratna translation, with peer-reviewed experimental and clinical studies identified through targeted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and PubMed Central records. The classical system rests on a staged, individualized approach: cleansing (Vrana-Sodhana), promotion of healing Vrana-Ropana), and an enumerated repertoire of sixty therapeutic measures (Sashṭi Upakrama), supported by a detailed classification of wounds by origin (Nija and Agantu), by Dosha predominance, and by the distinction between clean (suddha) and vitiated (Dushta) wounds. Contemporary studies, including randomized trials of Panchavalkala preparations, Manjisthadi Ghrita, honey and the medicated seton (Ksharasutra), report promising results, yet the evidence base remains limited by small samples, single-arm designs, heterogeneous outcome measures and inconsistent product standardization. The review critically appraises these limitations, distinguishes classical textual claims from experimental and clinical evidence, and identifies priorities for future research, including adequately powered randomized trials, standardized formulations, validated outcome reporting and translational studies. Although direct equivalence between Ayurvedic categories and modern wound classifications should not be assumed, several classical principles, including staged wound preparation, infection control, and systemic and dietary support, show meaningful conceptual convergence with contemporary wound care.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Government Ayurvedic College and Hospital (IN), Desh Bhagat Ayurvedic College and Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon