Research on the Reverse Denial System of Corporate Personality

The reverse denial of corporate personality is a judicial system in which, when a shareholder abuses the company‘s independent status and limited liability to evade personal debts, the company’s independent liability is denied, and the company is held jointly and severally liable for the shareholder‘s debts. China’s Company Law provides for forward denial, but reverse denial remains a legislative vacuum, leading to inconsistent judicial standards in practice. This paper adopts case analysis and comparative research to review domestic practical cases, revealing problems such as a lack of legal basis, unclear boundaries, and difficulties in proof. Drawing on the experiences of the United States, Germany, and Japan, this paper proposes suggestions for constructing China‘s reverse denial system: exceptional application, interest balance, and case-specific application; clarifying the subject element—bringing controllers into the scope of liable parties; focusing the conduct element on asset commingling; adopting the subjective element as bad faith presumption; the result element as comprehensive assessment of solvency; and the causation element as five-part test. It also suggests improving litigation subjects, burden of proof, and judicial interpretation, as well as introducing a capital exemption mechanism to protect bona fide shareholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academic Journal of Law and Society
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54097/wjx7dc60
Primary Topic
Corporate Governance and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on the Reverse Denial System of Corporate Personality

Huanrong Yao
Academic Journal of Law and Society
Corporate Governance and Law
article

Research on the Reverse Denial System of Corporate Personality

Huanrong Yao
article en

Abstract

The reverse denial of corporate personality is a judicial system in which, when a shareholder abuses the company‘s independent status and limited liability to evade personal debts, the company’s independent liability is denied, and the company is held jointly and severally liable for the shareholder‘s debts. China’s Company Law provides for forward denial, but reverse denial remains a legislative vacuum, leading to inconsistent judicial standards in practice. This paper adopts case analysis and comparative research to review domestic practical cases, revealing problems such as a lack of legal basis, unclear boundaries, and difficulties in proof. Drawing on the experiences of the United States, Germany, and Japan, this paper proposes suggestions for constructing China‘s reverse denial system: exceptional application, interest balance, and case-specific application; clarifying the subject element—bringing controllers into the scope of liable parties; focusing the conduct element on asset commingling; adopting the subjective element as bad faith presumption; the result element as comprehensive assessment of solvency; and the causation element as five-part test. It also suggests improving litigation subjects, burden of proof, and judicial interpretation, as well as introducing a capital exemption mechanism to protect bona fide shareholders.

Academic Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 2(1)
Guangdong Peizheng College (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Corporate Governance and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon