Real-World Early Prostate-Specific Antigen Response Comparison Among Patients with Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in the United States

Background Despite the availability of several androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), there has been a lack of head-to-head randomized clinical trials to evaluate their comparative efficacy in this population. Objective This real-world study provides a comprehensive and robust comparison of the decline in prostate-specific antigen ≥90% (PSA90) among patients with mCSPC who initiated apalutamide or abiraterone acetate in the United States. Methods Clinical data were collected from US community urology practices by Precision Point Specialty Analytics and linked with administrative claims from the Komodo Health Solutions Research Database. Patients with mCSPC were included in apalutamide or abiraterone acetate cohorts based on their first dispensation/paid claim on or after September 17, 2019 (index date), and followed to the earliest of treatment discontinuation or switch, end of insurance/clinical activity, or end of data availability (Dec. 31, 2023). Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced potentially confounding patient characteristics. PSA90 response by 6 months post index was compared between the cohorts using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis and time to PSA90 response was compared using a weighted Cox model with a time-varying treatment effect. Results The study included 1351 patients in the apalutamide cohort and 1003 patients in the abiraterone acetate cohort. By 6 months, 61.4% of the weighted apalutamide cohort and 45.9% of the weighted abiraterone acetate cohort achieved a PSA90 response. Compared with abiraterone acetate, patients treated with apalutamide were 73% more likely to achieve a PSA90 response at 6 months (weighted hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.08; P < .001). The median time to PSA90 response was 3.8 and 8.7 months in the apalutamide and abiraterone acetate cohorts, respectively. Conclusions The results of this study confirm that patients with mCSPC treated with apalutamide have significantly higher rates of PSA90 response compared with abiraterone acetate after 6 months of treatment. Real-world evidence highlights apalutamide as an important treatment option to improve the prognosis of patients with mCSPC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of health economics and outcomes research
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36469/001c.170641
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Early Prostate-Specific Antigen Response Comparison Among Patients with Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in the United States

Sabree C Burbage, Gordon W. Wong, Frédéric Kinkead, Carmine Rossi et al.
5 links
Journal of health economics and outcomes research
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
article

Real-World Early Prostate-Specific Antigen Response Comparison Among Patients with Metastatic Castration Sensitive Prostate Cancer Treated with Apalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate in the United States

Sabree C Burbage, Gordon W. Wong, Frédéric Kinkead, Carmine Rossi, Benjamin H. Lowentritt, Charmi Patel, Dominic Pilon, Neal D. Shore, Mehmet A. Bilen
article en

Abstract

Background Despite the availability of several androgen receptor pathway inhibitors for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), there has been a lack of head-to-head randomized clinical trials to evaluate their comparative efficacy in this population. Objective This real-world study provides a comprehensive and robust comparison of the decline in prostate-specific antigen ≥90% (PSA90) among patients with mCSPC who initiated apalutamide or abiraterone acetate in the United States. Methods Clinical data were collected from US community urology practices by Precision Point Specialty Analytics and linked with administrative claims from the Komodo Health Solutions Research Database. Patients with mCSPC were included in apalutamide or abiraterone acetate cohorts based on their first dispensation/paid claim on or after September 17, 2019 (index date), and followed to the earliest of treatment discontinuation or switch, end of insurance/clinical activity, or end of data availability (Dec. 31, 2023). Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced potentially confounding patient characteristics. PSA90 response by 6 months post index was compared between the cohorts using weighted Kaplan-Meier analysis and time to PSA90 response was compared using a weighted Cox model with a time-varying treatment effect. Results The study included 1351 patients in the apalutamide cohort and 1003 patients in the abiraterone acetate cohort. By 6 months, 61.4% of the weighted apalutamide cohort and 45.9% of the weighted abiraterone acetate cohort achieved a PSA90 response. Compared with abiraterone acetate, patients treated with apalutamide were 73% more likely to achieve a PSA90 response at 6 months (weighted hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-2.08; P < .001). The median time to PSA90 response was 3.8 and 8.7 months in the apalutamide and abiraterone acetate cohorts, respectively. Conclusions The results of this study confirm that patients with mCSPC treated with apalutamide have significantly higher rates of PSA90 response compared with abiraterone acetate after 6 months of treatment. Real-world evidence highlights apalutamide as an important treatment option to improve the prognosis of patients with mCSPC.

Journal of health economics and outcomes researchVol. 13(2)
Chesapeake Urology Associates (US), Carolina Urologic Research Center (US), Winship Cancer Institute (US)
Winship Cancer Institute
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon