Ion‐Conducting Ceramics in Lithium‐Ion Batteries: From Electrode Modification to Composite Electrolytes for Quasi‐Solid‐State Cells

The development of lithium‐based batteries requires advanced electrolyte systems capable of ensuring efficient ion transport and reliable electrode–electrolyte interfaces. In this work, inorganic lithium‐ion conductors have been investigated as components of composite polymer electrolytes and as functional modifiers of Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 anodes. Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 was modified by mechanical mixing with 1 wt% of representative ion conductors, including NASICON‐type Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP), garnet‐type Li 6.5 La 3 Zr 1.5 Nb 0.5 O 12 (LLZNO), and perovskite‐type Li 0.5 La 0.5 TiO 3 (LLTO), intended to distribute the ceramic particles over the LTO surface as a physical (nonbonded) coating, and evaluated in lithium‐ion cells employing either a conventional liquid electrolyte or quasi‐solid‐state composite polymer electrolytes. Electrochemical characterization by galvanostatic cycling and cyclic voltammetry demonstrated distinct electrochemical behavior depending on the incorporated ceramic phase, with LATP‐containing systems showing the most favorable rate performance and overall internal resistance among the investigated modified configurations. In the quasi‐solid‐state cells, the higher internal resistance compared with liquid‐electrolyte cells limited the rate capability at high currents, while stable cycling was observed at 1C. Furthermore, laboratory‐scale quasi‐solid‐state pouch cells employing the composite polymer electrolyte delivered a discharge capacity of 159 mAh·g −1 at C/10, comparable to that of the corresponding liquid‐electrolyte cells (148 mAh·g −1 ), with ~2% first‐cycle capacity loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Batteries & Supercaps
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.70523
Primary Topic
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ion‐Conducting Ceramics in Lithium‐Ion Batteries: From Electrode Modification to Composite Electrolytes for Quasi‐Solid‐State Cells

Natalia Stryzhakova, Wojciech M. Kujawski, Halyna Bubela, Ivan Lisovskyi et al.
1 links
Batteries & Supercaps
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
article

Ion‐Conducting Ceramics in Lithium‐Ion Batteries: From Electrode Modification to Composite Electrolytes for Quasi‐Solid‐State Cells

Natalia Stryzhakova, Wojciech M. Kujawski, Halyna Bubela, Ivan Lisovskyi, Yurii A. Maletin, Oleksii A. Syvolozhskyi, Anatoli Bilous, Iryna Yefimishch, Sergii Tychyna
article en

Abstract

The development of lithium‐based batteries requires advanced electrolyte systems capable of ensuring efficient ion transport and reliable electrode–electrolyte interfaces. In this work, inorganic lithium‐ion conductors have been investigated as components of composite polymer electrolytes and as functional modifiers of Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 anodes. Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 was modified by mechanical mixing with 1 wt% of representative ion conductors, including NASICON‐type Li 1.3 Al 0.3 Ti 1.7 (PO 4 ) 3 (LATP), garnet‐type Li 6.5 La 3 Zr 1.5 Nb 0.5 O 12 (LLZNO), and perovskite‐type Li 0.5 La 0.5 TiO 3 (LLTO), intended to distribute the ceramic particles over the LTO surface as a physical (nonbonded) coating, and evaluated in lithium‐ion cells employing either a conventional liquid electrolyte or quasi‐solid‐state composite polymer electrolytes. Electrochemical characterization by galvanostatic cycling and cyclic voltammetry demonstrated distinct electrochemical behavior depending on the incorporated ceramic phase, with LATP‐containing systems showing the most favorable rate performance and overall internal resistance among the investigated modified configurations. In the quasi‐solid‐state cells, the higher internal resistance compared with liquid‐electrolyte cells limited the rate capability at high currents, while stable cycling was observed at 1C. Furthermore, laboratory‐scale quasi‐solid‐state pouch cells employing the composite polymer electrolyte delivered a discharge capacity of 159 mAh·g −1 at C/10, comparable to that of the corresponding liquid‐electrolyte cells (148 mAh·g −1 ), with ~2% first‐cycle capacity loss.

Batteries & SupercapsVol. 9(11)
Nicolaus Copernicus University (PL), V.I. Vernadsky Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon