Insights Into the Electrochemical Response of Commercial Carbon Screen‐Printed Electrodes

Commercial carbon‐based screen‐printed electrodes (SPEs) are extensively used across a wide range of fields, particularly as versatile platforms for subsequent modification with nanomaterials, biomolecules, and complex functional systems. These modifications enable the development of sensors for diverse applications, including environmental monitoring, clinical diagnostics, point‐of‐care testing, quality control, and food safety analysis. Despite their widespread use, the specific type of commercial electrode selected is often treated as a secondary factor, although its influence on analytical performance should not be underestimated. In this study, six commercially available carbon‐based SPEs were investigated by comparing their electrochemical behavior using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Both outer‐ and inner‐sphere redox probes were employed to provide complementary insights into electrochemical performance. These electrochemical measurements were combined with wettability, topography, and surface characterizations to better understand how variations in surface heterogeneity contribute to differences in electrochemical reversibility, mass transport regimes, and current intensity. Furthermore, the results highlight that electrode performance variability arises not only between different commercial SPEs, but also from repeated measurements on the same electrode and from changes in experimental configuration, such as conventional bulk solution measurements compared to droplet‐based setups, emphasizing the critical role of testing conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ChemElectroChem
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.70339
Primary Topic
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insights Into the Electrochemical Response of Commercial Carbon Screen‐Printed Electrodes

V. Pifferi, Gianlorenzo Bussetti, L. Falciola, G. Cappelletti et al.
4 links
ChemElectroChem
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
article

Insights Into the Electrochemical Response of Commercial Carbon Screen‐Printed Electrodes

V. Pifferi, Gianlorenzo Bussetti, L. Falciola, G. Cappelletti, Giorgia Ballabio, Yuwei Zhang, Anna Secundo
article en

Abstract

Commercial carbon‐based screen‐printed electrodes (SPEs) are extensively used across a wide range of fields, particularly as versatile platforms for subsequent modification with nanomaterials, biomolecules, and complex functional systems. These modifications enable the development of sensors for diverse applications, including environmental monitoring, clinical diagnostics, point‐of‐care testing, quality control, and food safety analysis. Despite their widespread use, the specific type of commercial electrode selected is often treated as a secondary factor, although its influence on analytical performance should not be underestimated. In this study, six commercially available carbon‐based SPEs were investigated by comparing their electrochemical behavior using cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Both outer‐ and inner‐sphere redox probes were employed to provide complementary insights into electrochemical performance. These electrochemical measurements were combined with wettability, topography, and surface characterizations to better understand how variations in surface heterogeneity contribute to differences in electrochemical reversibility, mass transport regimes, and current intensity. Furthermore, the results highlight that electrode performance variability arises not only between different commercial SPEs, but also from repeated measurements on the same electrode and from changes in experimental configuration, such as conventional bulk solution measurements compared to droplet‐based setups, emphasizing the critical role of testing conditions.

ChemElectroChemVol. 13(21)
University of Milan (IT), National Interuniversity Consortium of Materials Science and Technology (IT), Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Electrochemical sensors and biosensors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon