Environmental performance of smallholder dairy farming systems under different levels of technology adoption

Smallholder dairy farming is essential to milk production and rural livelihoods in Indonesia; however, its environmental performance under different levels of technology adoption remains insufficiently quantified.This study aimed to quantify the global warming potential (GWP), acidification, and eutrophication of smallholder dairy farms in Central Java, compare these impacts among technology-adoption categories, and identify production inputs associated with environmental hotspots.A cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using 1 kg of fresh milk at the farm gate as the functional unit.Primary data were collected from 40 Friesian Holstein dairy farms through field observations, farmer interviews, farm records, and measurements of daily farm activities.Farms were classified into five categories: no selected technology (Category I); using forage chopper (Category II); forage chopper and milking machine (Category III); using biogas (Category IV); and an integrated system combining a forage chopper, milking machine, and biogas (Category V).Environmental impacts were assessed using OpenLCA 2.5, the CML-IA baseline method, and the Ecoinvent 3.10 background database.Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Games-Howell post hoc tests, and multiple linear regression.The mean impacts were 1.94 ± 0.82 kg CO₂-eq, 0.0073 ± 0.003 kg SO₂-eq, and 0.0160 ± 0.008 kg PO₄³⁻-eq per kg milk for GWP, acidification, and eutrophication, respectively.The category V produced the lowest impacts, at 1.16 ± 0.25 kg CO₂-eq, 0.0042 ± 0.0010 kg SO₂-eq, and 0.0095 ± 0.0023 kg PO₄³⁻-eq per kg milk.Biogas adoption alone did not provide the lowest environmental burdens.Concentrate, direct emissions, and detergent use were significantly associated with all three impact categories.In conclusion, integrated technology adoption improves environmental performance more effectively than stand-alone interventions.Policymakers and dairy cooperatives should promote integrated technology packages alongside combines feed efficiency, improved manure management, biogas utilization, and use of environmentally preferable detergents, technical support for smallholders' dairy farmers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/240341
Primary Topic
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental performance of smallholder dairy farming systems under different levels of technology adoption

Ari Prima, Charongpun Musikavong, Yoyon Wahyono, Mukh Arifin et al.
1 links
Ecological Engineering & Environmental Technology
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
article

Environmental performance of smallholder dairy farming systems under different levels of technology adoption

Ari Prima, Charongpun Musikavong, Yoyon Wahyono, Mukh Arifin, Nouval Ilham Ramadhan, Gigih Budi Irawan
article en

Abstract

Smallholder dairy farming is essential to milk production and rural livelihoods in Indonesia; however, its environmental performance under different levels of technology adoption remains insufficiently quantified.This study aimed to quantify the global warming potential (GWP), acidification, and eutrophication of smallholder dairy farms in Central Java, compare these impacts among technology-adoption categories, and identify production inputs associated with environmental hotspots.A cradle-to-farm-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted using 1 kg of fresh milk at the farm gate as the functional unit.Primary data were collected from 40 Friesian Holstein dairy farms through field observations, farmer interviews, farm records, and measurements of daily farm activities.Farms were classified into five categories: no selected technology (Category I); using forage chopper (Category II); forage chopper and milking machine (Category III); using biogas (Category IV); and an integrated system combining a forage chopper, milking machine, and biogas (Category V).Environmental impacts were assessed using OpenLCA 2.5, the CML-IA baseline method, and the Ecoinvent 3.10 background database.Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Games-Howell post hoc tests, and multiple linear regression.The mean impacts were 1.94 ± 0.82 kg CO₂-eq, 0.0073 ± 0.003 kg SO₂-eq, and 0.0160 ± 0.008 kg PO₄³⁻-eq per kg milk for GWP, acidification, and eutrophication, respectively.The category V produced the lowest impacts, at 1.16 ± 0.25 kg CO₂-eq, 0.0042 ± 0.0010 kg SO₂-eq, and 0.0095 ± 0.0023 kg PO₄³⁻-eq per kg milk.Biogas adoption alone did not provide the lowest environmental burdens.Concentrate, direct emissions, and detergent use were significantly associated with all three impact categories.In conclusion, integrated technology adoption improves environmental performance more effectively than stand-alone interventions.Policymakers and dairy cooperatives should promote integrated technology packages alongside combines feed efficiency, improved manure management, biogas utilization, and use of environmentally preferable detergents, technical support for smallholders' dairy farmers.

Ecological Engineering & Environmental TechnologyVol. 27(12)
Diponegoro University (ID), Prince of Songkla University (TH), National Research and Innovation Agency (ID)
Universitas Diponegoro
Responsible consumption and production, Zero hunger, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon