Serious Adverse Events in Adult ICU Patients: A Substudy of the PATIENCE Cohort

INTRODUCTION: Prokinetic agents are used to enhance upper gastrointestinal motility, but adverse events related to these agents are poorly described. We aimed to provide detailed epidemiological data on predefined serious adverse events (SAEs) in a cohort of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with and without prokinetic treatment. We hypothesised that all predefined SAEs would occur in both patients treated and those not treated with prokinetic agents, and that a higher number of SAEs would occur among patients treated with prokinetic agents for more than three consecutive days. METHODS: This substudy of the inception cohort study "Prokinetic agents in adult intensive care unit patients" included acutely admitted adult ICU patients. The prokinetic agents assessed (exposures) were erythromycin, metoclopramide, domperidone, and prucalopride. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing at least one episode of five pre-specified SAEs during ICU stay (cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, vomiting with aspiration, diarrhoea, extrapyramidal symptoms). Secondary outcomes were (1) proportion of patients experiencing each SAE, (2) the proportion of patients experiencing any of the SAEs after prokinetic treatment stratified by longest consecutive treatment duration, (3) time from index ICU admission to first SAE and (4) time from prokinetic initiation to first SAE. All analyses were descriptive, summarising SAE proportions and timing overall and according to prokinetic exposure. RESULTS: Among 1440 adult ICU patients, 710 SAEs occurred in 354 patients (24.6%), most commonly cardiac arrhythmias (199/1440, 13.8%). Across the exposure groups, the proportion of patients experiencing one or more SAEs ranged from 23.0% to 42.5%. Among patients treated with prokinetic agents for > 3 consecutive days, 14/59 (23.7%) experienced a SAE, which was similar to the proportion observed among patients not receiving prokinetic agents (291/1.253, 23.2%). Most SAEs occurred on median Day 2 after ICU admission and on median Day 3 after prokinetic initiation. CONCLUSION: One in four adult ICU patients experienced at least one SAE, with cardiac arrhythmias being the most frequent. Among patients receiving prokinetic agents, the proportion experiencing one or more SAEs ranged from 23.0% to 42.5% across treatment groups. The findings from this study may help inform the design of a future clinical trial. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This analysis presents reported serious adverse event observed in an ICU trial cohort assessing gastrointestinal prokinetic drug effects. Serious adverse events were reported frequently in both the drug treatment groups and the comparison (no prokinetic drug) group. Types of serious adverse events reported are presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70382
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Serious Adverse Events in Adult ICU Patients: A Substudy of the PATIENCE Cohort

Johanna Hästbacka, Waleed A. Alhazzani, Anders Perner, Mette Krag et al.
3 links
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Serious Adverse Events in Adult ICU Patients: A Substudy of the PATIENCE Cohort

Johanna Hästbacka, Waleed A. Alhazzani, Anders Perner, Mette Krag, Ricard Ferrer, Vera Crone, Wojciech Szczeklik, Morten Hylander Møller, Abdulrahman Abdullah Al-Fares, Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller, Marlies Ostermann, Anders Granholm, Annika Reintam Blaser, Frederik Keus
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prokinetic agents are used to enhance upper gastrointestinal motility, but adverse events related to these agents are poorly described. We aimed to provide detailed epidemiological data on predefined serious adverse events (SAEs) in a cohort of adult intensive care unit (ICU) patients with and without prokinetic treatment. We hypothesised that all predefined SAEs would occur in both patients treated and those not treated with prokinetic agents, and that a higher number of SAEs would occur among patients treated with prokinetic agents for more than three consecutive days. METHODS: This substudy of the inception cohort study "Prokinetic agents in adult intensive care unit patients" included acutely admitted adult ICU patients. The prokinetic agents assessed (exposures) were erythromycin, metoclopramide, domperidone, and prucalopride. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients experiencing at least one episode of five pre-specified SAEs during ICU stay (cardiac arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, vomiting with aspiration, diarrhoea, extrapyramidal symptoms). Secondary outcomes were (1) proportion of patients experiencing each SAE, (2) the proportion of patients experiencing any of the SAEs after prokinetic treatment stratified by longest consecutive treatment duration, (3) time from index ICU admission to first SAE and (4) time from prokinetic initiation to first SAE. All analyses were descriptive, summarising SAE proportions and timing overall and according to prokinetic exposure. RESULTS: Among 1440 adult ICU patients, 710 SAEs occurred in 354 patients (24.6%), most commonly cardiac arrhythmias (199/1440, 13.8%). Across the exposure groups, the proportion of patients experiencing one or more SAEs ranged from 23.0% to 42.5%. Among patients treated with prokinetic agents for > 3 consecutive days, 14/59 (23.7%) experienced a SAE, which was similar to the proportion observed among patients not receiving prokinetic agents (291/1.253, 23.2%). Most SAEs occurred on median Day 2 after ICU admission and on median Day 3 after prokinetic initiation. CONCLUSION: One in four adult ICU patients experienced at least one SAE, with cardiac arrhythmias being the most frequent. Among patients receiving prokinetic agents, the proportion experiencing one or more SAEs ranged from 23.0% to 42.5% across treatment groups. The findings from this study may help inform the design of a future clinical trial. EDITORIAL COMMENT: This analysis presents reported serious adverse event observed in an ICU trial cohort assessing gastrointestinal prokinetic drug effects. Serious adverse events were reported frequently in both the drug treatment groups and the comparison (no prokinetic drug) group. Types of serious adverse events reported are presented.

Acta Anaesthesiologica ScandinavicaVol. 71(1)
University of Bern (CH), University of Copenhagen (DK), Jagiellonian University (PL), Guy's Hospital (GB), St Thomas' Hospital (GB), University Medical Center Groningen (NL), King's College London (GB), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Amiri Hospital (KW), Luzerner Kantonsspital (CH), Tampere University Hospital (FI), Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES), Ministry of Health (KW), Holbæk Sygehus (DK), Ministry of Defense (SA), Research and Innovation Institute (SA), University of Tartu (EE), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon