Measurement-Dependent Parameter Recoverability in Neural Cardiovascular LPN Inference

Estimating cardiovascular lumped-parameter network (LPN) parameters from limited hemodynamic observations is a potentially non-unique inverse problem in cardiovascular model personalization. We investigated how parameter recoverability depends on measurement availability and noise, and whether poor recovery reflects limitations of neural inference or insufficient observational information. We developed Mada (measurement-availability and difficulty-aware), a probabilistic neural framework that provides parameter estimates and predictive uncertainty under incomplete observations. Using a closed-loop, four-chamber cardiovascular LPN with time-varying elastance, we generated a synthetic population of 650,000 cases comprising 20 chamber-mechanics and vascular parameters and up to 30 hemodynamic and timing observations. Under complete observations, Mada achieved macro R2 = 0.862, maintaining competitive accuracy across neural baselines while providing parameter-specific uncertainty. Recoverability varied substantially across parameters, with atrial active elastances remaining particularly difficult. For mask-aware Mada, macro R2 ranged from 0.066 with basic clinical measurements to 0.751 with a rich clinical set and 0.842 with all measurements, while uncertainty generally increased as informative measurements were removed. Bounded direct optimization achieved substantially smaller hemodynamic residuals but did not consistently recover the generating parameters. Complementary profile and local-sensitivity analyses revealed case-specific parameter compensation and weak observational directions, while target-specific fine-tuning offered little improvement for difficult atrial parameters. Increasing measurement noise degraded both parameter recovery and predictive-interval coverage, and similar trends were observed with a simpler probabilistic ResMLP. These findings demonstrate that accurate reconstruction of observed hemodynamics does not necessarily imply accurate recovery of the underlying LPN parameters, highlighting the importance of assessing parameter recoverability and predictive uncertainty when physiologically meaningful parameter estimates are sought.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.762665
Primary Topic
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Measurement-Dependent Parameter Recoverability in Neural Cardiovascular LPN Inference

Nanlong Sun, Lei Shi, Yue Li, Yurui Chen et al.
1 links
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
preprint

Measurement-Dependent Parameter Recoverability in Neural Cardiovascular LPN Inference

Nanlong Sun, Lei Shi, Yue Li, Yurui Chen, Sanjian Zhang
preprint en

Abstract

Estimating cardiovascular lumped-parameter network (LPN) parameters from limited hemodynamic observations is a potentially non-unique inverse problem in cardiovascular model personalization. We investigated how parameter recoverability depends on measurement availability and noise, and whether poor recovery reflects limitations of neural inference or insufficient observational information. We developed Mada (measurement-availability and difficulty-aware), a probabilistic neural framework that provides parameter estimates and predictive uncertainty under incomplete observations. Using a closed-loop, four-chamber cardiovascular LPN with time-varying elastance, we generated a synthetic population of 650,000 cases comprising 20 chamber-mechanics and vascular parameters and up to 30 hemodynamic and timing observations. Under complete observations, Mada achieved macro R2 = 0.862, maintaining competitive accuracy across neural baselines while providing parameter-specific uncertainty. Recoverability varied substantially across parameters, with atrial active elastances remaining particularly difficult. For mask-aware Mada, macro R2 ranged from 0.066 with basic clinical measurements to 0.751 with a rich clinical set and 0.842 with all measurements, while uncertainty generally increased as informative measurements were removed. Bounded direct optimization achieved substantially smaller hemodynamic residuals but did not consistently recover the generating parameters. Complementary profile and local-sensitivity analyses revealed case-specific parameter compensation and weak observational directions, while target-specific fine-tuning offered little improvement for difficult atrial parameters. Increasing measurement noise degraded both parameter recovery and predictive-interval coverage, and similar trends were observed with a simpler probabilistic ResMLP. These findings demonstrate that accurate reconstruction of observed hemodynamics does not necessarily imply accurate recovery of the underlying LPN parameters, highlighting the importance of assessing parameter recoverability and predictive uncertainty when physiologically meaningful parameter estimates are sought.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Caterpillar (United States) (US), Kennesaw State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Kennesaw State University, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Good health and well-being
Model Reduction and Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon