Experiences of Parents in Understanding Psychological Children Evaluation Reports

This study analyzes parental perceptions of two school psychological children evaluation report formats: the traditional test-oriented format laden with technical jargon, and the accessible format employing plain language, thematic organization, and practical recommendations. Thematic analysis of 52 response units from 38 parents revealed sharp polarization. Thirty-nine percent of responses described traditional reports as “difficult to understand,” while 21% emphasized “disempowering” effects that induced anxiety and alienation. In contrast, 53% highlighted the clarity of plain language, and 47% praised thematic organization and the relocation of score tables to appendices. These findings confirm that readability and organization are not peripheral concerns but central determinants of a report’s effectiveness in bridging school–family communication. Accessible formats significantly enhance comprehension, restore parental confidence, and strengthen collaborative utility in educational planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22373/psikoislamedia.v11i2.35223
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experiences of Parents in Understanding Psychological Children Evaluation Reports

Ellen Prima
Psikoislamedia Jurnal Psikologi
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

Experiences of Parents in Understanding Psychological Children Evaluation Reports

Ellen Prima
article en

Abstract

This study analyzes parental perceptions of two school psychological children evaluation report formats: the traditional test-oriented format laden with technical jargon, and the accessible format employing plain language, thematic organization, and practical recommendations. Thematic analysis of 52 response units from 38 parents revealed sharp polarization. Thirty-nine percent of responses described traditional reports as “difficult to understand,” while 21% emphasized “disempowering” effects that induced anxiety and alienation. In contrast, 53% highlighted the clarity of plain language, and 47% praised thematic organization and the relocation of score tables to appendices. These findings confirm that readability and organization are not peripheral concerns but central determinants of a report’s effectiveness in bridging school–family communication. Accessible formats significantly enhance comprehension, restore parental confidence, and strengthen collaborative utility in educational planning.

Psikoislamedia Jurnal PsikologiVol. 11(2)
Universitas Islam Negeri Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon