Resolving the accessibility–sustainability friction: technology's role in including disadvantaged groups in green tourism

Purpose Technologies adopted to green tourism destinations (car-free zones, paperless ticketing, app-only wayfinding) can unintentionally exclude disadvantaged and vulnerable travellers, yet accessibility, sustainability and technology research largely evaluate this problem separately. This review maps, classifies and examines the literature at this intersection and translates the findings into a practical framework for destination managers. Design/methodology/approach Following PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S, searches of Scopus and Web of Science, supplemented by two keyword-variant rounds, yielded 33 studies (2016–2026). Each study was deductively coded for Enablers, Friction Points and Reconciliation Pathways and cross-checked against an exploratory four-topic Latent Dirichlet Allocation model. Findings Two-thirds of studies (66.7%) discuss a technology that lowers accessibility barriers, but only 39.4% discuss a pathway reconciling it with sustainability goals, and 27.3% discuss both. The gap is sharpest in older-adult/silver-tourism technology research and smallest in virtual/heritage-technology research. Cross-tabulating the two categories yields the Green-Inclusive Technology Alignment (GITA) matrix: Aligned (27.3%), Enabler Blind-Spot (39.4%), Process-Only (12.1%) and Unexamined (21.2%). Sensitivity checks show the pattern is robust to eligibility tier and study type. Practical implications GITA is operationalised as an eight-step audit checklist that destination management organisations, hotel operators and city planners can apply before adopting a technology, so that accessibility–sustainability trade-offs are checked rather than assumed away. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review to jointly map, deductively classify and topic-model the literature on technology's dual role in tourism accessibility and sustainability, contributing a diagnostic classification logic (GITA) and an evidence-grounded, practitioner-facing audit tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/whatt-09-2026-0354
Primary Topic
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resolving the accessibility–sustainability friction: technology's role in including disadvantaged groups in green tourism

Nohman Khan, Albattat Ahmad, Huma Sikandar
1 links
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
article

Resolving the accessibility–sustainability friction: technology's role in including disadvantaged groups in green tourism

Nohman Khan, Albattat Ahmad, Huma Sikandar
article en

Abstract

Purpose Technologies adopted to green tourism destinations (car-free zones, paperless ticketing, app-only wayfinding) can unintentionally exclude disadvantaged and vulnerable travellers, yet accessibility, sustainability and technology research largely evaluate this problem separately. This review maps, classifies and examines the literature at this intersection and translates the findings into a practical framework for destination managers. Design/methodology/approach Following PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S, searches of Scopus and Web of Science, supplemented by two keyword-variant rounds, yielded 33 studies (2016–2026). Each study was deductively coded for Enablers, Friction Points and Reconciliation Pathways and cross-checked against an exploratory four-topic Latent Dirichlet Allocation model. Findings Two-thirds of studies (66.7%) discuss a technology that lowers accessibility barriers, but only 39.4% discuss a pathway reconciling it with sustainability goals, and 27.3% discuss both. The gap is sharpest in older-adult/silver-tourism technology research and smallest in virtual/heritage-technology research. Cross-tabulating the two categories yields the Green-Inclusive Technology Alignment (GITA) matrix: Aligned (27.3%), Enabler Blind-Spot (39.4%), Process-Only (12.1%) and Unexamined (21.2%). Sensitivity checks show the pattern is robust to eligibility tier and study type. Practical implications GITA is operationalised as an eight-step audit checklist that destination management organisations, hotel operators and city planners can apply before adopting a technology, so that accessibility–sustainability trade-offs are checked rather than assumed away. Originality/value To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review to jointly map, deductively classify and topic-model the literature on technology's dual role in tourism accessibility and sustainability, contributing a diagnostic classification logic (GITA) and an evidence-grounded, practitioner-facing audit tool.

Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes
Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation (MY), University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon