Perceived Credibility and Educational Acceptance of Faculty-Verified Social Media Micro-Learning in the Undergraduate Dental Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Background: Short-form social media videos are widely used by dental students as supplementary learning material, but concerns about content credibility and the absence of peer review persist.Objective: The aim of this study is to assess undergraduate dental students' perceived credibility, utility, clinical confidence, perceived cognitive overload, engagement, and acceptance of faculty-verified social media micro-learning, and preferred video length.The study measured students' perceptions; no intervention was implemented, and no learning outcomes were assessed.Methods: A voluntary, anonymous, 13-item online questionnaire (Google Forms) was circulated among undergraduate dental students recruited through institutional portals and student channels accessible to the authors in Maharashtra, India.Favourable meant agree or strongly agree on a 5-point Likert scale.Analyses were n (%) with 95% Wilson confidence intervals, exact binomial tests against 50%, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Holm correction.Results: Among respondents answering each item, favourable responses were given by 104/195 (53.3%) for credibility, 99/195 (50.8%) for trust in endorsed content, 113/195 (57.9%) for concept understanding, 110/198 (55.6%) for procedural retention, 106/196 (54.1%) for clinical confidence, 119/198 (60.1%) for perceived reduction in cognitive overload, 124/195 (63.6%) for curricular integration, 119/194 (61.3%) for engagement, and 120/206 (58.3%) for motivation to revise.After Holm correction, curricular integration (p=0.002),engagement (p=0.016), and perceived cognitive overload (p=0.038)remained significantly above 50%.Conclusions: In this self-selected sample drawn mainly from interns and senior students, using an unvalidated questionnaire, about half to three-fifths of respondents viewed faculty-verified micro-learning favourably, with the clearest support for curricular integration.Findings reflect perceptions only and need confirmation in probability samples with objective outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.118850
Primary Topic
Social Media in Health Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived Credibility and Educational Acceptance of Faculty-Verified Social Media Micro-Learning in the Undergraduate Dental Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Shivsagar Tewary, Abhijeet Kore, Shilpa Soman, Tanvi D Denge et al.
3 links
Cureus
Social Media in Health Education
article

Perceived Credibility and Educational Acceptance of Faculty-Verified Social Media Micro-Learning in the Undergraduate Dental Curriculum: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Shivsagar Tewary, Abhijeet Kore, Shilpa Soman, Tanvi D Denge, Ajay V Gaikwad
article en

Abstract

Background: Short-form social media videos are widely used by dental students as supplementary learning material, but concerns about content credibility and the absence of peer review persist.Objective: The aim of this study is to assess undergraduate dental students' perceived credibility, utility, clinical confidence, perceived cognitive overload, engagement, and acceptance of faculty-verified social media micro-learning, and preferred video length.The study measured students' perceptions; no intervention was implemented, and no learning outcomes were assessed.Methods: A voluntary, anonymous, 13-item online questionnaire (Google Forms) was circulated among undergraduate dental students recruited through institutional portals and student channels accessible to the authors in Maharashtra, India.Favourable meant agree or strongly agree on a 5-point Likert scale.Analyses were n (%) with 95% Wilson confidence intervals, exact binomial tests against 50%, chi-square goodness-of-fit tests, and Holm correction.Results: Among respondents answering each item, favourable responses were given by 104/195 (53.3%) for credibility, 99/195 (50.8%) for trust in endorsed content, 113/195 (57.9%) for concept understanding, 110/198 (55.6%) for procedural retention, 106/196 (54.1%) for clinical confidence, 119/198 (60.1%) for perceived reduction in cognitive overload, 124/195 (63.6%) for curricular integration, 119/194 (61.3%) for engagement, and 120/206 (58.3%) for motivation to revise.After Holm correction, curricular integration (p=0.002),engagement (p=0.016), and perceived cognitive overload (p=0.038)remained significantly above 50%.Conclusions: In this self-selected sample drawn mainly from interns and senior students, using an unvalidated questionnaire, about half to three-fifths of respondents viewed faculty-verified micro-learning favourably, with the clearest support for curricular integration.Findings reflect perceptions only and need confirmation in probability samples with objective outcomes.

Cureus
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Social Media in Health Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon