From evidence to impact: purposeful use of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks in genomics and precision health

A growing number of genomics precision health applications are supported by robust evidence, yet their integration into routine clinical and population health practice remains slow, uneven, and inequitable. This article demonstrates how implementation science (IS) theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) can support the translation of evidence-based genomics applications by presenting three cases from pediatric precision oncology, reproductive genetic carrier screening, and population genomic screening for hereditary conditions. Across the three cases, IS TMFs were purposefully selected, adapted, combined, or supplemented to fit the implementation context, core complexities, and the conceptual work required, and were revisited as implementation evolved. We argue that this purposeful approach can provide an operational backbone for integrating precision health innovations into real-world systems of care and help transform individual implementation efforts into transferable knowledge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1949272
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From evidence to impact: purposeful use of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks in genomics and precision health

Megan Clarke Roberts, Soroush Fariman, Stephanie Best, Natalie Taylor
1 links
Frontiers in Public Health
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

From evidence to impact: purposeful use of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks in genomics and precision health

Megan Clarke Roberts, Soroush Fariman, Stephanie Best, Natalie Taylor
article en

Abstract

A growing number of genomics precision health applications are supported by robust evidence, yet their integration into routine clinical and population health practice remains slow, uneven, and inequitable. This article demonstrates how implementation science (IS) theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) can support the translation of evidence-based genomics applications by presenting three cases from pediatric precision oncology, reproductive genetic carrier screening, and population genomic screening for hereditary conditions. Across the three cases, IS TMFs were purposefully selected, adapted, combined, or supplemented to fit the implementation context, core complexities, and the conceptual work required, and were revisited as implementation evolved. We argue that this purposeful approach can provide an operational backbone for integrating precision health innovations into real-world systems of care and help transform individual implementation efforts into transferable knowledge.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Impact (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
From evidence to impact: purposeful use of implementation science theories, models, and frameworks in genomics and precision health — Megan Clarke Roberts, Soroush Fariman, et al. · Frontiers in Public Health (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS