Comparison of subjective orofacial esthetic perception and objective malocclusion severity: a cross-sectional study

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare subjective orofacial esthetic perception assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) with objective malocclusion severity assessed using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), and to identify demographic and occlusal factors associated with OES scores. A total of 263 participants (163 females and 100 males) were included. OES summary scores were calculated from seven items (range, 0–70), with higher scores indicating greater esthetic satisfaction. DAI scores were categorized according to established malocclusion severity thresholds. Associations with demographic characteristics were examined using appropriate non-parametric and categorical tests, the relationship between continuous DAI and OES scores was assessed using Spearman correlation, and factors associated with OES scores were evaluated using univariable and multivariable linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors. DAI category distribution was significantly associated with education level ( p = 0.010), but not with gender ( p = 0.235) or age group ( p = 0.080). Female participants had lower OES scores than males in the unadjusted comparison (median 44.0 vs 47.0; p = 0.034), whereas OES scores did not differ significantly across education levels ( p = 0.436). DAI and OES scores showed a moderate inverse correlation (Spearman’s ρ = − 0.407, p < 0.001). In the adjusted model, largest anterior maxillary irregularity (β = − 1.690, p < 0.001), maxillary overjet (β = − 1.337, p = 0.005), and mandibular overjet (β = − 3.182, p = 0.002) remained independently associated with lower OES scores, whereas gender, age, and education level were not independently associated with subjective esthetic satisfaction. These findings indicate that greater objective malocclusion severity is associated with poorer self-perceived orofacial esthetics and support incorporating patient-reported esthetic assessments alongside normative clinical indices in orthodontic evaluation and treatment planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-77640-0
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of subjective orofacial esthetic perception and objective malocclusion severity: a cross-sectional study

Ömer Hatipoğlu, Busra Beser, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu, Rümeysa Şahin
Scientific Reports
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
article

Comparison of subjective orofacial esthetic perception and objective malocclusion severity: a cross-sectional study

Ömer Hatipoğlu, Busra Beser, Fatma Pertek Hatipoğlu, Rümeysa Şahin
article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare subjective orofacial esthetic perception assessed using the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) with objective malocclusion severity assessed using the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), and to identify demographic and occlusal factors associated with OES scores. A total of 263 participants (163 females and 100 males) were included. OES summary scores were calculated from seven items (range, 0–70), with higher scores indicating greater esthetic satisfaction. DAI scores were categorized according to established malocclusion severity thresholds. Associations with demographic characteristics were examined using appropriate non-parametric and categorical tests, the relationship between continuous DAI and OES scores was assessed using Spearman correlation, and factors associated with OES scores were evaluated using univariable and multivariable linear regression with HC3 robust standard errors. DAI category distribution was significantly associated with education level ( p = 0.010), but not with gender ( p = 0.235) or age group ( p = 0.080). Female participants had lower OES scores than males in the unadjusted comparison (median 44.0 vs 47.0; p = 0.034), whereas OES scores did not differ significantly across education levels ( p = 0.436). DAI and OES scores showed a moderate inverse correlation (Spearman’s ρ = − 0.407, p < 0.001). In the adjusted model, largest anterior maxillary irregularity (β = − 1.690, p < 0.001), maxillary overjet (β = − 1.337, p = 0.005), and mandibular overjet (β = − 3.182, p = 0.002) remained independently associated with lower OES scores, whereas gender, age, and education level were not independently associated with subjective esthetic satisfaction. These findings indicate that greater objective malocclusion severity is associated with poorer self-perceived orofacial esthetics and support incorporating patient-reported esthetic assessments alongside normative clinical indices in orthodontic evaluation and treatment planning.

Scientific Reports
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University (TR)
Recep Tayyip Erdogan Üniversitesi
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon