Colonial Law and Racism: Revealing the Hierarchy of Justice in the Colonial Period in Indonesian History

This study examines how colonial law institutionalized racial hierarchy and structured unequal access to justice in the Dutch East Indies. Employing a qualitative legal-historical approach integrated with Critical Race Theory (CRT), the research analyzes colonial legal instruments, judicial arrangements, and historical scholarship to investigate the relationship between racial classification, legal pluralism, and institutional inequality. The analysis focuses on the Regeringsreglement (RR), Indische Staatsregeling (ISR), Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW), Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Wijkenstelsel, Passenstelsel, and Intergentiel Recht. The findings demonstrate that colonial racial classification established differentiated legal statuses that shaped applicable law, judicial jurisdiction, procedural arrangements, and administrative regulation. These mechanisms operated as an interconnected institutional system through which racial hierarchy was legally organized and reproduced. Spatial restrictions further regulated residence and mobility, while inter-group law accommodated relationships across legally differentiated populations without dismantling the broader colonial hierarchy. The study also identifies normative and institutional continuities after Indonesian independence, while recognizing that inherited legal structures underwent significant constitutional and institutional transformations. By integrating legal-historical analysis with CRT, this article conceptualizes the colonial hierarchy of justice as an institutional architecture connecting racial classification, procedural differentiation, spatial governance, and inter-group legal relations. It contributes to scholarship on colonial legal pluralism by demonstrating how the recognition of legal diversity could coexist with unequal institutional authority, while highlighting the historical complexities and continuing challenges of legal decolonization in Indonesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Unnes Law Journal
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v12i1.49651
Primary Topic
Legal and cultural studies analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Colonial Law and Racism: Revealing the Hierarchy of Justice in the Colonial Period in Indonesian History

Shakila Che Dahalan, Dimas Aldi Pangestu, Tarunasena Tarunasena, Wawan Darmawan
1 links
Unnes Law Journal
Legal and cultural studies analysis
article

Colonial Law and Racism: Revealing the Hierarchy of Justice in the Colonial Period in Indonesian History

Shakila Che Dahalan, Dimas Aldi Pangestu, Tarunasena Tarunasena, Wawan Darmawan
article en

Abstract

This study examines how colonial law institutionalized racial hierarchy and structured unequal access to justice in the Dutch East Indies. Employing a qualitative legal-historical approach integrated with Critical Race Theory (CRT), the research analyzes colonial legal instruments, judicial arrangements, and historical scholarship to investigate the relationship between racial classification, legal pluralism, and institutional inequality. The analysis focuses on the Regeringsreglement (RR), Indische Staatsregeling (ISR), Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW), Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR), Wijkenstelsel, Passenstelsel, and Intergentiel Recht. The findings demonstrate that colonial racial classification established differentiated legal statuses that shaped applicable law, judicial jurisdiction, procedural arrangements, and administrative regulation. These mechanisms operated as an interconnected institutional system through which racial hierarchy was legally organized and reproduced. Spatial restrictions further regulated residence and mobility, while inter-group law accommodated relationships across legally differentiated populations without dismantling the broader colonial hierarchy. The study also identifies normative and institutional continuities after Indonesian independence, while recognizing that inherited legal structures underwent significant constitutional and institutional transformations. By integrating legal-historical analysis with CRT, this article conceptualizes the colonial hierarchy of justice as an institutional architecture connecting racial classification, procedural differentiation, spatial governance, and inter-group legal relations. It contributes to scholarship on colonial legal pluralism by demonstrating how the recognition of legal diversity could coexist with unequal institutional authority, while highlighting the historical complexities and continuing challenges of legal decolonization in Indonesia.

Unnes Law JournalVol. 12(1)
Indonesia University of Education (ID), Sultan Idris Education University (MY)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Legal and cultural studies analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon