SAE Marriage Theory Paper 3: Into One's Own / SAE 婚姻论 Paper 3: 成就

SAE Marriage Theory Paper 3. This record holds the Chinese text and its English edition. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. This paper reads bringing each other into their own: in the 15DD direction, in a marriage the meaning of each belongs to each, and the outlet of one's direction falls outside oneself; one place where it falls is on the other, letting the other grow into the other's own self. Bringing someone into their own names an act here; it does not name a result, and it is not a metric. Bringing someone into their own is cultivation, and is a direction; whether it took hold lies at the other's end. To declare on the other's behalf, on the sole basis of my judgment of success, that his constitution has been completed is no longer bringing him into his own. I bring you into your own without waiting for you to bring me into mine first; your direction is yours, and I can only make space for it; it is completed at your end, and is not mine to settle. Only when two such one-ways meet is it mutual; it is not obtained by exchange; if they do not meet, each one's share is still there as before; nor is mutuality a state a marriage is meant to reach. Bringing someone into their own takes two main ways, creating conditions and questioning; questioning leaves the question to the other, and to draw the conclusion on the other's behalf is to take my direction as the other's ruler. Mutuality requires neither simultaneity nor equality, and keeps no accounts: bringing each other into their own is not entered as an account of exchange awaiting the other's repayment, while commitments, contributions and the effects already left are entered as before; division of labor and cooperation is not exchange; complementarity is not a problem; demanding of each other that the other be the same as oneself is what takes my direction as the other's ruler. What the other has gained from me, once avowed in his own law, is his in the attribution of constitution, and does not become a constitution I completed on his behalf; shared property, contribution, credit and responsibility each have their own accounts. Within the boundary of not infringing the positions of other subjects, the other may go in directions I did not foresee or do not approve of, and may even go in a direction in which he no longer needs me; this sentence is in the mode of ability, not a statement of fact. Bringing each other into their own has a mutual shape, and does not certify 16DD. The direction of colonization read from this matter is fixing for the other what he ought to become, and converting the conditions provided into ownership of the other's first-person constitutive results; to write bringing someone into their own as exchange is falling back; to hand over one's own share is accommodation, not bringing someone into their own: it is not having stood, and structurally carries no direction of colonization toward the other; how things are on his own side cannot be seen from outside, and this paper does not judge it. This paper interfaces with Mill, Aristotle and Tan Sitong, and points back to Kant, with whom Action Theory has already interfaced. This paper does not prove that bringing each other into their own makes a marriage last, does not prove that one ought to bring the other into his own, and does not prove that the party who has been brought into his own ought all the more to stay. SAE 婚姻论 Paper 3。本记录收中文正文与英文版;英文版是独立重写,不是翻译,两版不一致处以中文为准。 这一篇读互相成就:在 15DD 方向上,婚姻里两个人的意义各归各人,方向的出口落在自己之外,其中一处落在对方身上,让对方成长成对方自己。成就在这里作动词用,不指成果,也不作指标。 成就就是涵育,是方向;成没成,在对方那一端。仅凭我的成功评价就替对方认定他的构成已经完成,就不再是成就。我成就你,不等你先成就我;你的方向是你的,我只能为它腾出空间,它在你那一端完成,不在我这里结账。两个这样的单向碰上了,才是互相;不是交换来的,碰不上,各人那一份照旧在;互相也不是一段婚姻要达到的状态。成就主要有两种方式,创造条件与追问;追问把问题留给对方,替对方下了结论,就是拿我的方向当对方的尺子。互相不要求同时,不要求对等,不记账:不把互相成就记成待对方偿还的交换账,承诺、贡献与已经留下的作用照记;分工协作不是交换;互补不是问题,互相要求对方跟自己一样,才是拿我的方向当对方的尺子。 对方从我这里得着的,一经他自己的法认领,在构成归属上就是他的,不成为我替他完成的构成;共同的财物、贡献、功劳与责任各有各的账。在不侵害其他主体位置的边界内,对方可以走向我没有预料、不同意、甚至不再需要我的方向;这一句是能力式的,不是事实断言。互相成就有双向的形状,不认证 16DD。从这一件上读到的殖民方向,是替对方定他该成为什么,和把所给条件换算成对对方第一人称构成成果的占有;把成就写成交换,是回落;把自己那一份交了出去,是迁就,不是成就:它没有站住,从结构上看没有向对方去的殖民方向;他自己这一侧怎样,从外面看不出来,这一篇不判。这一篇与穆勒、亚里士多德、谭嗣同对接,回指行动论已做的康德。这一篇不证明互相成就使婚姻长久,不证明应当成就对方,也不证明被成就的一方更该留下。 Related works Relation: Cites · Resource type: Publication / Preprint · Scheme: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19328662 10.5281/zenodo.22731235 10.5281/zenodo.22974154 10.5281/zenodo.22970783 10.5281/zenodo.22991142 10.5281/zenodo.23000910 10.5281/zenodo.23545115 10.5281/zenodo.23545047 10.5281/zenodo.23545023 10.5281/zenodo.23545057 10.5281/zenodo.23545076 10.5281/zenodo.23545097 10.5281/zenodo.23627776 10.5281/zenodo.23627779 10.5281/zenodo.23627781