Progestogens Modulate the Metabolic but Not the Musculoskeletal Response to Estradiol in a Mouse Model of Adolescent Gender Transition

Gender-affirming hormone therapy in transgender girls typically consists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa)-mediated puberty suppression followed by estradiol (E2) treatment. While the skeletal effects of this approach have been investigated, its impact on skeletal muscle and metabolism remains unclear. Moreover, the addition of a progestogen such as natural progesterone (P4) or synthetic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to the standard E2 regimen has gained popularity due to presumed enhanced feminization, despite limited evidence regarding its effects on musculoskeletal and metabolic tissues. Here, we used a mouse model of adolescent male-to-female transition to address these questions. Peripubertal male mice were treated with a GnRHa to suppress endogenous sex hormone production, followed by E2 alone or in combination with P4 or MPA. Puberty suppression reduced the acquisition of bone mass and strength, impaired endurance capacity, decreased lean mass, altered muscle fiber type composition, and increased adiposity. E2 treatment increased bone outcomes to female control levels, and partially normalized endurance capacity, body composition, and metabolic parameters. Addition of a progestogen did not further affect bone or muscle outcomes beyond E2 alone. In contrast, progestogen co-administration worsened metabolic parameters, resulting in increased adiposity, impaired glucose tolerance, elevated fasting glucose and insulin, and hepatic lipid accumulation. These effects were more pronounced with MPA than with P4. In conclusion, E2 drives musculoskeletal recovery following puberty suppression, whereas progestogens do not provide additional benefits in these tissues. However, they adversely affect metabolic outcomes, highlighting the need for careful evaluation when these compounds are included in gender-affirming therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The FASEB Journal
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202602013r
Primary Topic
Hormonal and reproductive studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Progestogens Modulate the Metabolic but Not the Musculoskeletal Response to Estradiol in a Mouse Model of Adolescent Gender Transition

Séverine Lamon, Nick Narinx, Anton De Spiegeleer, Marc Cherlet et al.
1 links
The FASEB Journal
Hormonal and reproductive studies
article

Progestogens Modulate the Metabolic but Not the Musculoskeletal Response to Estradiol in a Mouse Model of Adolescent Gender Transition

Séverine Lamon, Nick Narinx, Anton De Spiegeleer, Marc Cherlet, Guy G. T'Sjoen, Siska Croubels, Lindsey Devisscher, Vanessa Dubois, Steve Stegen, Liesbeth Crombez, Tom de Waal, Lieve Verlinden, Ruslan I. Dmitriev, Flore Stappers, Eric Gracey, Chris Vercruysse, Dirk Sw Elewaut, Oriana Nobus, Martine Cools, Karel Van Belleghem, Toke Liekens, Sandra Calvo Blanco, Karo Tuypens, Boya Zhang
article en

Abstract

Gender-affirming hormone therapy in transgender girls typically consists of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog (GnRHa)-mediated puberty suppression followed by estradiol (E2) treatment. While the skeletal effects of this approach have been investigated, its impact on skeletal muscle and metabolism remains unclear. Moreover, the addition of a progestogen such as natural progesterone (P4) or synthetic medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to the standard E2 regimen has gained popularity due to presumed enhanced feminization, despite limited evidence regarding its effects on musculoskeletal and metabolic tissues. Here, we used a mouse model of adolescent male-to-female transition to address these questions. Peripubertal male mice were treated with a GnRHa to suppress endogenous sex hormone production, followed by E2 alone or in combination with P4 or MPA. Puberty suppression reduced the acquisition of bone mass and strength, impaired endurance capacity, decreased lean mass, altered muscle fiber type composition, and increased adiposity. E2 treatment increased bone outcomes to female control levels, and partially normalized endurance capacity, body composition, and metabolic parameters. Addition of a progestogen did not further affect bone or muscle outcomes beyond E2 alone. In contrast, progestogen co-administration worsened metabolic parameters, resulting in increased adiposity, impaired glucose tolerance, elevated fasting glucose and insulin, and hepatic lipid accumulation. These effects were more pronounced with MPA than with P4. In conclusion, E2 drives musculoskeletal recovery following puberty suppression, whereas progestogens do not provide additional benefits in these tissues. However, they adversely affect metabolic outcomes, highlighting the need for careful evaluation when these compounds are included in gender-affirming therapy.

The FASEB JournalVol. 40(21)
Deakin University (AU), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
McMaster University, Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Universiteit Gent, Vlaamse regering, Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds UGent
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Hormonal and reproductive studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon