Application of the Principle of Lex Favor Reo in the Decision of Narcotics Crimes during the Transition Period of the National Criminal Code (Study of the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision in 2026)

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (National Criminal Code), concurrent with Law Number 1 of 2026 concerning Criminal Adjustments, came into effect on January 2, 2026, giving rise to intertemporal legal issues (transitoir strafrecht) in narcotics crimes where the tempus delicti occurred before that date but were only tried thereafter. Article 3 Paragraph (1) of the National Criminal Code stipulates the principle of lex favor reo as a guideline for resolving intertemporal legal conflicts, but its application in Supreme Court cassation decisions demonstrates a variety of inconsistent legal considerations, thus giving rise to issues of consistency and legal certainty. This study aims to examine the philosophical basis for the application of the lex favor reo principle, its regulations according to the National Criminal Code and the Narcotics Law, and its application in the Supreme Court's cassation decision in 2026. The results of the study indicate that the philosophical basis of the lex favor reo principle is derived from the values ​​of Pancasila justice and the guarantee of fair legal certainty in Article 28D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution; normatively, this principle is regulated in Article 3 Paragraphs (1) and (7) of the National Criminal Code which are directly related to changes in the structure of narcotics criminal threats after the Criminal Adjustment Law from cumulative to alternative without a specific minimum limit; In practice, the three cassation decisions reviewed consistently apply this principle ex officio to mitigate the sentences of drug defendants, albeit with varying degrees of legal reasoning. Decision Number 463 K/Pid.Sus/2026 demonstrates the most systematic application through a quantitative comparison of the old and new criminal penalties.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Journal of Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55927/cjas.v4i10.13
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of the Principle of Lex Favor Reo in the Decision of Narcotics Crimes during the Transition Period of the National Criminal Code (Study of the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision in 2026)

Atikah Rahmi, Putra Perdana Situmorang
Contemporary Journal of Applied Sciences
Criminal Law and Policy
article

Application of the Principle of Lex Favor Reo in the Decision of Narcotics Crimes during the Transition Period of the National Criminal Code (Study of the Supreme Court's Cassation Decision in 2026)

Atikah Rahmi, Putra Perdana Situmorang
article en

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code (National Criminal Code), concurrent with Law Number 1 of 2026 concerning Criminal Adjustments, came into effect on January 2, 2026, giving rise to intertemporal legal issues (transitoir strafrecht) in narcotics crimes where the tempus delicti occurred before that date but were only tried thereafter. Article 3 Paragraph (1) of the National Criminal Code stipulates the principle of lex favor reo as a guideline for resolving intertemporal legal conflicts, but its application in Supreme Court cassation decisions demonstrates a variety of inconsistent legal considerations, thus giving rise to issues of consistency and legal certainty. This study aims to examine the philosophical basis for the application of the lex favor reo principle, its regulations according to the National Criminal Code and the Narcotics Law, and its application in the Supreme Court's cassation decision in 2026. The results of the study indicate that the philosophical basis of the lex favor reo principle is derived from the values ​​of Pancasila justice and the guarantee of fair legal certainty in Article 28D Paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution; normatively, this principle is regulated in Article 3 Paragraphs (1) and (7) of the National Criminal Code which are directly related to changes in the structure of narcotics criminal threats after the Criminal Adjustment Law from cumulative to alternative without a specific minimum limit; In practice, the three cassation decisions reviewed consistently apply this principle ex officio to mitigate the sentences of drug defendants, albeit with varying degrees of legal reasoning. Decision Number 463 K/Pid.Sus/2026 demonstrates the most systematic application through a quantitative comparison of the old and new criminal penalties.

Contemporary Journal of Applied SciencesVol. 4(10)
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara (ID)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Criminal Law and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon