AI shopping agents and the reallocation of consumer attention: seller visibility and platform access in agentic commerce

Purpose This study develops a theoretical model of how AI shopping agents reallocate shopping activity, reshape seller visibility and alter platform control in digital commerce. Consumer attention is defined as the allocation of shopping episodes across channels, distinct from visual or cognitive attention. Design/methodology/approach A two-seller platform model compares platform-mediated and AI-agent-mediated shopping. The platform chooses agent access and ranking bias; sellers choose price, platform-facing visibility and agent-facing adaptation. Heterogeneous AI-use costs make channel use endogenous, while a fixed implementation cost creates an adaptation threshold. Extensions separate information access from transaction execution and test the robustness of the analytical regimes numerically. Findings Agent access is profitable when transaction and AI-channel gains outweigh lost ranking monetization and governance costs, and information access may remain open while transaction execution is restricted. Sellers activate agent-facing adaptation only when its incremental return covers implementation cost. AI-mediated shopping lowers prices when comparison pressure dominates verified differentiation. Ranking mismatch can turn the two visibility investments from complements into competing activities, and privately optimal openness can fall outside the welfare-improving interval. Originality/value Four features distinguish AI shopping agents from platform recommenders and comparison sites: delegated choice authority, cross-platform scope, multi-stage task execution and an independently governed ranking layer. The framework links these features to layered platform access, endogenous AI-channel use, distinct visibility investments, implementation costs, verifiable trust signals and divergence between private and social incentives in agentic commerce.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/apjml-07-2026-1801
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI shopping agents and the reallocation of consumer attention: seller visibility and platform access in agentic commerce

Banglei Zhao, Tieliang Kang
2 links
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

AI shopping agents and the reallocation of consumer attention: seller visibility and platform access in agentic commerce

Banglei Zhao, Tieliang Kang
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study develops a theoretical model of how AI shopping agents reallocate shopping activity, reshape seller visibility and alter platform control in digital commerce. Consumer attention is defined as the allocation of shopping episodes across channels, distinct from visual or cognitive attention. Design/methodology/approach A two-seller platform model compares platform-mediated and AI-agent-mediated shopping. The platform chooses agent access and ranking bias; sellers choose price, platform-facing visibility and agent-facing adaptation. Heterogeneous AI-use costs make channel use endogenous, while a fixed implementation cost creates an adaptation threshold. Extensions separate information access from transaction execution and test the robustness of the analytical regimes numerically. Findings Agent access is profitable when transaction and AI-channel gains outweigh lost ranking monetization and governance costs, and information access may remain open while transaction execution is restricted. Sellers activate agent-facing adaptation only when its incremental return covers implementation cost. AI-mediated shopping lowers prices when comparison pressure dominates verified differentiation. Ranking mismatch can turn the two visibility investments from complements into competing activities, and privately optimal openness can fall outside the welfare-improving interval. Originality/value Four features distinguish AI shopping agents from platform recommenders and comparison sites: delegated choice authority, cross-platform scope, multi-stage task execution and an independently governed ranking layer. The framework links these features to layered platform access, endogenous AI-channel use, distinct visibility investments, implementation costs, verifiable trust signals and divergence between private and social incentives in agentic commerce.

Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
Northeastern University (US), Luoyang Normal University (CN), Northeastern University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon