Operative Treatment of Quadrimalleolar and Quadrimalleolar-Equivalent Ankle Fractures: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Component-Based Operative Fixation

Background: Quadrimalleolar (QM) and quadrimalleolar-equivalent (QME) fractures expand the trimalleolar concept by adding an anterior osseous syndesmotic component (Chaput or Wagstaffe fragment). Outcomes after operative fixation remain incompletely defined. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 36 consecutive patients (18 QM, 18 QME) who underwent open reduction and internal fixation between April 2019 and December 2024, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. All patients underwent a component-based operative treatment strategy comprising preoperative computed tomographic (CT) characterization of each malleolar and syndesmotic component, morphology-based management of anterior fragments, and intraoperative arthroscopic assessment of residual instability. Syndesmotic reduction was assessed on bilateral CT 1 cm proximal to the plafond using direct anterior and posterior differences, fibular translation, and fibular rotation, referenced to the contralateral ankle. Clinical outcomes included Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Baseline demographics did not differ significantly between groups. QME injuries were predominantly SER (supination–external rotation) type IV/Weber B (94.4%), whereas QM showed an even distribution between SER and PER (pronation–external rotation) and between Weber B and C ( P = .01). No significant side-to-side differences were observed in any of the 4 parameters in either group at 1 year (all P > .05); given the limited sample size, these nonsignificant findings may be subject to a type II error. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.901-0.988). Mean OMAS improved to 86.1 ± 6.8 (QM) and 85.3 ± 5.7 (QME); VAS decreased to 1.0 ± 0.7 in both (within-group P < .001; between-group P = .82). All fractures united; 3 minor wound complications resolved with local care. Conclusion: A component-based operative treatment strategy was safe and associated with maintained anatomic distal tibiofibular alignment and favorable short-term outcomes in both QM and QME. The absence of a control group precludes conclusions on clinical necessity or superiority, and combined evaluation of these biomechanically distinct patterns should be interpreted with caution. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective comparative case series.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foot & Ankle International
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007261496226
Primary Topic
Foot and Ankle Surgery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operative Treatment of Quadrimalleolar and Quadrimalleolar-Equivalent Ankle Fractures: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Component-Based Operative Fixation

Eui Dong Yeo, Sung Hun Won, Woo Jong Kim, Chang Hwa Hong et al.
Foot & Ankle International
Foot and Ankle Surgery
article

Operative Treatment of Quadrimalleolar and Quadrimalleolar-Equivalent Ankle Fractures: Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Following Component-Based Operative Fixation

Eui Dong Yeo, Sung Hun Won, Woo Jong Kim, Chang Hwa Hong, Ki Jin Jung, Sung Hyun Lee, Jeong Han Nam, Ho Sung Kim
article en

Abstract

Background: Quadrimalleolar (QM) and quadrimalleolar-equivalent (QME) fractures expand the trimalleolar concept by adding an anterior osseous syndesmotic component (Chaput or Wagstaffe fragment). Outcomes after operative fixation remain incompletely defined. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 36 consecutive patients (18 QM, 18 QME) who underwent open reduction and internal fixation between April 2019 and December 2024, with a minimum 12-month follow-up. All patients underwent a component-based operative treatment strategy comprising preoperative computed tomographic (CT) characterization of each malleolar and syndesmotic component, morphology-based management of anterior fragments, and intraoperative arthroscopic assessment of residual instability. Syndesmotic reduction was assessed on bilateral CT 1 cm proximal to the plafond using direct anterior and posterior differences, fibular translation, and fibular rotation, referenced to the contralateral ankle. Clinical outcomes included Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Baseline demographics did not differ significantly between groups. QME injuries were predominantly SER (supination–external rotation) type IV/Weber B (94.4%), whereas QM showed an even distribution between SER and PER (pronation–external rotation) and between Weber B and C ( P = .01). No significant side-to-side differences were observed in any of the 4 parameters in either group at 1 year (all P > .05); given the limited sample size, these nonsignificant findings may be subject to a type II error. Intra- and interobserver reliabilities were excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.901-0.988). Mean OMAS improved to 86.1 ± 6.8 (QM) and 85.3 ± 5.7 (QME); VAS decreased to 1.0 ± 0.7 in both (within-group P < .001; between-group P = .82). All fractures united; 3 minor wound complications resolved with local care. Conclusion: A component-based operative treatment strategy was safe and associated with maintained anatomic distal tibiofibular alignment and favorable short-term outcomes in both QM and QME. The absence of a control group precludes conclusions on clinical necessity or superiority, and combined evaluation of these biomechanically distinct patterns should be interpreted with caution. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective comparative case series.

Foot & Ankle International
Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul (KR), Veterans Health Service Medical Center (KR), CHA University Bundang Medical Center (KR), Soonchunhyang University Hospital Cheonan (KR), CHA University (KR), Soonchunhyang University Hospital Bucheon (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Foot and Ankle Surgery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon