Practice variation and interdisciplinary care gaps in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare disorder requiring coordinated interdisciplinary management. The Austrian Network for IIH (AN4IH) has developed consensus-based recommendations to standardize its diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring; however, their uptake in clinical practice remains unassessed. METHODS: Between October 2025 and January 2026, all 1460 members of the Austrian Neurological Society (ÖGN) were invited to complete an anonymized online survey on diagnostic and therapeutic practices and AN4IH recommendation awareness, with a response rate of 3.7%. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 54 respondents 64.8% worked in a hospital setting. Nearly 80% treated 5 or fewer IIH patients per year. Low confidence in IIH management was reported by 33.3%, with a tendency toward greater confidence in hospital-based physicians (odds ratio, OR 2.55, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.68-9.86) and those treating 6 or more patients annually (OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.46-27.96). Interdisciplinary pathways were lacking in 55.6% of settings. Routine diagnostics included brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 98.1%), neurological examination (94.4%), ophthalmological assessment (85.2%), and lumbar puncture (77.8%). Venous MR angiography (53.7%), perimetry (46.3%), optical coherence tomography (31.5%), and optic nerve sonography (14.8%) were used less consistently. Acetazolamide (98.1%) and weight reduction (90.7%) were the dominant treatment strategies. The AN4IH recommendations were partially known to 44.5% of respondents. Of those, 95.8% perceived them as a valuable clinical resource. DISCUSSION: Substantial practice variation in IIH management was observed among survey respondents. The AN4IH recommendations are widely perceived as supportive and may help standardize care. Yet implementation requires broader interdisciplinary structures in specialized settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-026-02847-0
Primary Topic
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practice variation and interdisciplinary care gaps in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Gabriel Bsteh, Gregor Broessner, Berthold Pemp, Nik Krajnc et al.
3 links
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
article

Practice variation and interdisciplinary care gaps in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

Gabriel Bsteh, Gregor Broessner, Berthold Pemp, Nik Krajnc, Jan Philipp Nolte, Stefan Leis, Lukas Gattermeyer‐Kell, AN4IH Network of the Austrian Neurological Society (ÖGN) Neuroophthalmology Working Group
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a rare disorder requiring coordinated interdisciplinary management. The Austrian Network for IIH (AN4IH) has developed consensus-based recommendations to standardize its diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring; however, their uptake in clinical practice remains unassessed. METHODS: Between October 2025 and January 2026, all 1460 members of the Austrian Neurological Society (ÖGN) were invited to complete an anonymized online survey on diagnostic and therapeutic practices and AN4IH recommendation awareness, with a response rate of 3.7%. Associations between categorical variables were assessed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the 54 respondents 64.8% worked in a hospital setting. Nearly 80% treated 5 or fewer IIH patients per year. Low confidence in IIH management was reported by 33.3%, with a tendency toward greater confidence in hospital-based physicians (odds ratio, OR 2.55, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.68-9.86) and those treating 6 or more patients annually (OR 2.62, 95% CI 0.46-27.96). Interdisciplinary pathways were lacking in 55.6% of settings. Routine diagnostics included brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI, 98.1%), neurological examination (94.4%), ophthalmological assessment (85.2%), and lumbar puncture (77.8%). Venous MR angiography (53.7%), perimetry (46.3%), optical coherence tomography (31.5%), and optic nerve sonography (14.8%) were used less consistently. Acetazolamide (98.1%) and weight reduction (90.7%) were the dominant treatment strategies. The AN4IH recommendations were partially known to 44.5% of respondents. Of those, 95.8% perceived them as a valuable clinical resource. DISCUSSION: Substantial practice variation in IIH management was observed among survey respondents. The AN4IH recommendations are widely perceived as supportive and may help standardize care. Yet implementation requires broader interdisciplinary structures in specialized settings.

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift
Innsbruck Medical University (AT), Universität Innsbruck (AT), Medical University of Graz (AT), Paracelsus Medical University (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon