Residential Segregation and Unequal Access to Local Public Services in India: Evidence from 1.5 Million Neighborhoods

We study residential segregation and access to public services across 1.5 million urban and rural neighborhoods in India. Muslim and Scheduled Caste segregation in India is high by global standards and only slightly lower than Black-White segregation in the United States. Within cities, public facilities and infrastructure are systematically less available in Muslim and Scheduled Caste neighborhoods. Nearly all regressive allocation is across neighborhoods within cities—at the most informal and least studied form of government. These inequalities are not visible in the aggregate data typically used for research and policy. (JEL H76, J15, O15, O17, O18, R23)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20240179
Primary Topic
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Residential Segregation and Unequal Access to Local Public Services in India: Evidence from 1.5 Million Neighborhoods

Sam Asher, Kritarth Jha, Paul Michael Novosad, Anjali Adukia et al.
1 links
American Economic Review
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
article

Residential Segregation and Unequal Access to Local Public Services in India: Evidence from 1.5 Million Neighborhoods

Sam Asher, Kritarth Jha, Paul Michael Novosad, Anjali Adukia, Brandon Tan
article en

Abstract

We study residential segregation and access to public services across 1.5 million urban and rural neighborhoods in India. Muslim and Scheduled Caste segregation in India is high by global standards and only slightly lower than Black-White segregation in the United States. Within cities, public facilities and infrastructure are systematically less available in Muslim and Scheduled Caste neighborhoods. Nearly all regressive allocation is across neighborhoods within cities—at the most informal and least studied form of government. These inequalities are not visible in the aggregate data typically used for research and policy. (JEL H76, J15, O15, O17, O18, R23)

American Economic ReviewVol. 116(11)
Dartmouth College (US), Imperial College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon