Performance Comparison of XGBoost and LSTM for Rupiah–USD Exchange Rate Prediction

Fluctuations in the Rupiah exchange rate against the US Dollar (USD/IDR) pose challenges to economic stability, making accurate prediction important for policymakers, businesses, and investors. This study compares XGBoost and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models in predicting the USD/IDR exchange rate using daily selling and buying rates from Bank Indonesia covering January 2010 to December 2025. The preprocessing stages include log return transformation, feature engineering using lag returns, rolling volatility, and moving average returns, as well as normalization using StandardScaler. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using random search, while model evaluation was conducted using walk-forward validation with periodic retraining. Model performance was measured using MAE, RMSE, SMAPE, and Directional Accuracy (DA). The results show that LSTM achieves better performance in MAE (41.41 IDR), SMAPE (0.2588%), and DA (52.74%), while XGBoost obtains a lower RMSE (56.63), indicating more stable performance in handling larger prediction errors. Overall, both models produce comparable predictive performance, with LSTM showing a slight advantage in average prediction accuracy and directional movement prediction

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MALCOM Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v6i4.2809
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Comparison of XGBoost and LSTM for Rupiah–USD Exchange Rate Prediction

Estu Sinduningrum, Satria Fahlevi
3 links
MALCOM Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Performance Comparison of XGBoost and LSTM for Rupiah–USD Exchange Rate Prediction

Estu Sinduningrum, Satria Fahlevi
article en

Abstract

Fluctuations in the Rupiah exchange rate against the US Dollar (USD/IDR) pose challenges to economic stability, making accurate prediction important for policymakers, businesses, and investors. This study compares XGBoost and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) models in predicting the USD/IDR exchange rate using daily selling and buying rates from Bank Indonesia covering January 2010 to December 2025. The preprocessing stages include log return transformation, feature engineering using lag returns, rolling volatility, and moving average returns, as well as normalization using StandardScaler. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using random search, while model evaluation was conducted using walk-forward validation with periodic retraining. Model performance was measured using MAE, RMSE, SMAPE, and Directional Accuracy (DA). The results show that LSTM achieves better performance in MAE (41.41 IDR), SMAPE (0.2588%), and DA (52.74%), while XGBoost obtains a lower RMSE (56.63), indicating more stable performance in handling larger prediction errors. Overall, both models produce comparable predictive performance, with LSTM showing a slight advantage in average prediction accuracy and directional movement prediction

MALCOM Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science
Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof Dr Hamka (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Performance Comparison of XGBoost and LSTM for Rupiah–USD Exchange Rate Prediction — Estu Sinduningrum, Satria Fahlevi · MALCOM Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS