From Civic Loneliness to Participation Ecosystems: Rethinking Youth Agency in the Digital Public Sphere after Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026

Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026 (Youth Diagnosis 2026) identifies a tension that deserves particular attention: young people express an interest in public affairs and a desire to influence decisions, yet many experience low political efficacy and perceive formal channels of participation as weak or ineffective. At the same time, civic activity increasingly takes place within a digital ecosystem that expands opportunities for information, expression and mobilisation while also exposing young people to disinformation, fragmented attention and algorithmic influence. This commentary argues that these findings are best interpreted through a participation-ecosystem lens rather than through a binary opposition between online and offline engagement. Drawing on research on digital participation, political efficacy and meaningful youth participation, it proposes an analytical distinction between access, voice, audience, influence and institutional response. This perspective can strengthen future measurement of youth participation by asking not only whether young people participate, but whether their participation is heard, traceable and capable of producing feedback or influence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Youth in Central and Eastern Europe
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24917/ycee.13109
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Civic Loneliness to Participation Ecosystems: Rethinking Youth Agency in the Digital Public Sphere after Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026

Matteo Bartolini
Youth in Central and Eastern Europe
Social Media and Politics
article

From Civic Loneliness to Participation Ecosystems: Rethinking Youth Agency in the Digital Public Sphere after Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026

Matteo Bartolini
article en

Abstract

Diagnoza Młodzieży 2026 (Youth Diagnosis 2026) identifies a tension that deserves particular attention: young people express an interest in public affairs and a desire to influence decisions, yet many experience low political efficacy and perceive formal channels of participation as weak or ineffective. At the same time, civic activity increasingly takes place within a digital ecosystem that expands opportunities for information, expression and mobilisation while also exposing young people to disinformation, fragmented attention and algorithmic influence. This commentary argues that these findings are best interpreted through a participation-ecosystem lens rather than through a binary opposition between online and offline engagement. Drawing on research on digital participation, political efficacy and meaningful youth participation, it proposes an analytical distinction between access, voice, audience, influence and institutional response. This perspective can strengthen future measurement of youth participation by asking not only whether young people participate, but whether their participation is heard, traceable and capable of producing feedback or influence.

Youth in Central and Eastern EuropeVol. 13(22)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon