Measuring infectious disease stigma in the German population: Psychometric properties of stigma scales related to COVID-19, Long Covid and non-vaccination in a representative population sample

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic was widely accompanied by stigma towards certain groups of people, which can diminish efforts of disease control and exacerbate negative impacts of the disease itself. Research on COVID-19-related stigma in the German population is scarce and, internationally, is lacking validated and standardized measurement instruments. To address this issue, this study tested the psychometric properties of a set of scales to measure COVID-19-related stigma in a representative sample of the German population. Methods Overall, 1960 people (M(SD)age = 49.8(17.3) years, 55.8% female) participated in a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Germany. Six scales were tested, assessing public attitudes towards people who have had COVID-19 (COVID-PSS), those who had the disease multiple times (MI-PSS), people with Long Covid (LC-PSS) and people who chose not to get vaccinated (nonVac-PSS). We further assessed internalized stigma of individuals, who have had COVID-19 at least once (COINS) and those who chose not to get vaccinated (nonVac-IS). All scales were tested for their intended factorial structure through confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity and reliability. Results All scales, excepting the scale for internalized stigma of unvaccinated individuals, showed good to excellent fit indices and factor loadings, supporting their intended factorial structure. Convergent and discriminant validity were established for the public stigma scales. The COINS did not converge with a measure of quality of life, but with depressive symptoms, whereas the nonVac-IS did not show convergence with presumed related constructs. Reliability coefficients showed good internal consistency among the items. Conclusion Five out of the six scales proved to be valid tools to measure stigmatizing attitudes related to COVID-19, Long Covid and non-vaccination in a German sample. The scales hold promises for monitoring stigma during infectious disease outbreaks and informing the development of public health interventions to counteract health-related stigma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Public Health
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-026-02100-0
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring infectious disease stigma in the German population: Psychometric properties of stigma scales related to COVID-19, Long Covid and non-vaccination in a representative population sample

Thomas McLaren, Silke Schmidt, Samuel Tomczyk, Marlene Muehlmann et al.
Archives of Public Health
COVID-19 and Mental Health
article

Measuring infectious disease stigma in the German population: Psychometric properties of stigma scales related to COVID-19, Long Covid and non-vaccination in a representative population sample

Thomas McLaren, Silke Schmidt, Samuel Tomczyk, Marlene Muehlmann, Dafina Danqa, Carlotta Alpers, Jule Menzinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic was widely accompanied by stigma towards certain groups of people, which can diminish efforts of disease control and exacerbate negative impacts of the disease itself. Research on COVID-19-related stigma in the German population is scarce and, internationally, is lacking validated and standardized measurement instruments. To address this issue, this study tested the psychometric properties of a set of scales to measure COVID-19-related stigma in a representative sample of the German population. Methods Overall, 1960 people (M(SD)age = 49.8(17.3) years, 55.8% female) participated in a nationally representative cross-sectional survey in Germany. Six scales were tested, assessing public attitudes towards people who have had COVID-19 (COVID-PSS), those who had the disease multiple times (MI-PSS), people with Long Covid (LC-PSS) and people who chose not to get vaccinated (nonVac-PSS). We further assessed internalized stigma of individuals, who have had COVID-19 at least once (COINS) and those who chose not to get vaccinated (nonVac-IS). All scales were tested for their intended factorial structure through confirmatory factor analysis, convergent and discriminant validity and reliability. Results All scales, excepting the scale for internalized stigma of unvaccinated individuals, showed good to excellent fit indices and factor loadings, supporting their intended factorial structure. Convergent and discriminant validity were established for the public stigma scales. The COINS did not converge with a measure of quality of life, but with depressive symptoms, whereas the nonVac-IS did not show convergence with presumed related constructs. Reliability coefficients showed good internal consistency among the items. Conclusion Five out of the six scales proved to be valid tools to measure stigmatizing attitudes related to COVID-19, Long Covid and non-vaccination in a German sample. The scales hold promises for monitoring stigma during infectious disease outbreaks and informing the development of public health interventions to counteract health-related stigma.

Archives of Public Health
Universität Greifswald (DE)
Universität Greifswald
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
COVID-19 and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon