Socio-economics of elasmobranch fisheries in India: ecological, livelihood and governance dimensions

Sharks and rays are an important yet heterogeneous component of India’s marine fisheries, contributing to food supply, household income, processing, trade and associated services, while many species have life-history characteristics that make them sensitive to sustained fishing mortality. This review synthesizes ecological, fisheries, livelihood, market and governance evidence on Indian shark and ray fisheries using a structured narrative evidence-synthesis approach with documented information sources, search strings, eligibility criteria, a source hierarchy and fixed extraction fields. Quantitative evidence is reported with geographic unit, reference period, metric, source and comparability limitations. National ICAR–CMFRI landing estimates are used as the principal quantitative baseline; they are treated as monitoring indicators and not as direct measures of total catch, abundance or fishing mortality. Indian elasmobranch fisheries include directed capture, incidental capture, retained bycatch and discarding, often within the same multispecies fishing system, and the value chain extends beyond fins to meat, skin, liver oil and other commodities. Quantitative India-specific evidence on employment, income and gender remains limited, and global statistics are used only as context. Policy evidence is drawn from primary government and intergovernmental sources, with a distinction between policy publication, notification, implementation and evaluation. Species- and gear-specific monitoring, improved taxonomic resolution, bycatch mitigation, transparent value-chain information, gender-disaggregated socio-economic data and participatory governance are identified as more defensible immediate priorities than broad technology-led interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Fish Science
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frish.2026.1953012
Primary Topic
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socio-economics of elasmobranch fisheries in India: ecological, livelihood and governance dimensions

Kalaiarasi roselind, T. Jebarani Rajathy, T. Mohanraaj, S. Nandhitha et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Fish Science
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
article

Socio-economics of elasmobranch fisheries in India: ecological, livelihood and governance dimensions

Kalaiarasi roselind, T. Jebarani Rajathy, T. Mohanraaj, S. Nandhitha, S. R. T. Sherly Cross, S. Punitha, M. Sheeba
article en

Abstract

Sharks and rays are an important yet heterogeneous component of India’s marine fisheries, contributing to food supply, household income, processing, trade and associated services, while many species have life-history characteristics that make them sensitive to sustained fishing mortality. This review synthesizes ecological, fisheries, livelihood, market and governance evidence on Indian shark and ray fisheries using a structured narrative evidence-synthesis approach with documented information sources, search strings, eligibility criteria, a source hierarchy and fixed extraction fields. Quantitative evidence is reported with geographic unit, reference period, metric, source and comparability limitations. National ICAR–CMFRI landing estimates are used as the principal quantitative baseline; they are treated as monitoring indicators and not as direct measures of total catch, abundance or fishing mortality. Indian elasmobranch fisheries include directed capture, incidental capture, retained bycatch and discarding, often within the same multispecies fishing system, and the value chain extends beyond fins to meat, skin, liver oil and other commodities. Quantitative India-specific evidence on employment, income and gender remains limited, and global statistics are used only as context. Policy evidence is drawn from primary government and intergovernmental sources, with a distinction between policy publication, notification, implementation and evaluation. Species- and gear-specific monitoring, improved taxonomic resolution, bycatch mitigation, transparent value-chain information, gender-disaggregated socio-economic data and participatory governance are identified as more defensible immediate priorities than broad technology-led interventions.

Frontiers in Fish ScienceVol. 4
Manonmaniam Sundaranar University (IN), National Institute of Oceanography (IN)
Life below water, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Ichthyology and Marine Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon