Decision-Making on Deaths Subject to Domestic Abuse-Related Death Reviews in England and Wales: Do All Deaths Count?

In England and Wales, domestic abuse-related death reviews (DARDRs) bring stakeholders together to examine and learn from domestic abuse-related deaths. However, decision-making about which deaths to review has not been examined, creating a gap in knowledge about the notifications received, whether a DARDR is undertaken, and oversight and communication of outcomes. This exploratory study addresses this gap. Data were collected from the local partnership bodies responsible for decision-making about domestic abuse-related death notifications received between January 2017 and December 2024. A bespoke data collection instrument, distributed via a survey and Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, generated a dataset of 1,437 cases. Descriptive statistics are presented on notifications by source and case type; victim, perpetrator, and case characteristics; decision-making and stakeholder involvement; whether a DARDR was undertaken; oversight; and how decisions are communicated. Results showed increasing numbers but a changing profile of notifications: homicide is no longer the most common case type, having been superseded by suicide. However, missing data hampers decision-making. Improved understanding of decision-making about which deaths are reviewed has significant implications for state accountability. Further clarity and guidance are needed for commissioners and other stakeholders regarding notification, identification, and decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Homicide Studies
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10887679261495100
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-Making on Deaths Subject to Domestic Abuse-Related Death Reviews in England and Wales: Do All Deaths Count?

James Rowlands, Elizabeth A. Cook, Althea Cribb
1 links
Homicide Studies
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Decision-Making on Deaths Subject to Domestic Abuse-Related Death Reviews in England and Wales: Do All Deaths Count?

James Rowlands, Elizabeth A. Cook, Althea Cribb
article en

Abstract

In England and Wales, domestic abuse-related death reviews (DARDRs) bring stakeholders together to examine and learn from domestic abuse-related deaths. However, decision-making about which deaths to review has not been examined, creating a gap in knowledge about the notifications received, whether a DARDR is undertaken, and oversight and communication of outcomes. This exploratory study addresses this gap. Data were collected from the local partnership bodies responsible for decision-making about domestic abuse-related death notifications received between January 2017 and December 2024. A bespoke data collection instrument, distributed via a survey and Freedom of Information (FOI) requests, generated a dataset of 1,437 cases. Descriptive statistics are presented on notifications by source and case type; victim, perpetrator, and case characteristics; decision-making and stakeholder involvement; whether a DARDR was undertaken; oversight; and how decisions are communicated. Results showed increasing numbers but a changing profile of notifications: homicide is no longer the most common case type, having been superseded by suicide. However, missing data hampers decision-making. Improved understanding of decision-making about which deaths are reviewed has significant implications for state accountability. Further clarity and guidance are needed for commissioners and other stakeholders regarding notification, identification, and decision-making.

Homicide Studies
Durham University (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB)
British Academy
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon