Pragmatic trial of a self-directed intervention for weight loss in obstructive sleep apnea (POWER)

RATIONALE: Self-directed lifestyle interventions may improve access to weight loss care in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but effectiveness in routine practice is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Test whether a proactively delivered self-directed lifestyle intervention improves weight and sleep-related quality of life versus usual care. METHODS: POWER enrolled patients with OSA and body mass index of 30-45 kg/m2, recruited from Veteran Affairs (VA) sites nationwide, and randomized participants to a self-directed intervention based on the Diabetes Prevention Program with video-based sessions, readings, and regular coaching reminders or usual care. Co-primary outcomes were change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) and clinical weight in kilograms (kg) from baseline to 12 months post-randomization. Given two primary outcomes, we defined significance at p = 0.025. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This trial randomized 696 participants. Mean age was 56.2 years (SD 12.2), with 19.7% identifying as female. Clinical weights at 12 months were available for 81.9% of intervention and 83.6% of control participants. Unadjusted weight declined 2.1 kg (SD 6.8) in intervention and 0.9 kg (SD 5.9) in control (adjusted between-group difference: -1.1 kg, 95%CI -2.0, -0.1; p = 0.037). FOSQ measures were available at 12 months for 78.2% of intervention and 90.5% of control participants. From baseline to 12 months, unadjusted FOSQ improved 1.4 (SD 2.7) points in intervention and 0.9 (SD 2.9) points in control (adjusted between-group difference: 0.6 points, 95%CI 0.2, 1.0; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among participants with OSA and obesity, a self-directed lifestyle intervention did not improve weight loss and led to improvements in sleep-related quality of life that are of limited clinical importance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05104450, registered 10/19/2021.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajrccm/aamag574
Primary Topic
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic trial of a self-directed intervention for weight loss in obstructive sleep apnea (POWER)

Robert Plumley, Steven B. Zeliadt, Lucas M. Donovan, Jun Ma et al.
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
article

Pragmatic trial of a self-directed intervention for weight loss in obstructive sleep apnea (POWER)

Robert Plumley, Steven B. Zeliadt, Lucas M. Donovan, Jun Ma, Katherine D. Hoerster, James Pai, Kevin Josey, Travis Hee Wai, David H. Au, Anna P. Pannick, Krista S. Dashtestani, Aristotle Leonhard, Anthony F. Bais, Pramit Maskey, Jennifer McDowell
article en

Abstract

RATIONALE: Self-directed lifestyle interventions may improve access to weight loss care in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), but effectiveness in routine practice is unknown. OBJECTIVE: Test whether a proactively delivered self-directed lifestyle intervention improves weight and sleep-related quality of life versus usual care. METHODS: POWER enrolled patients with OSA and body mass index of 30-45 kg/m2, recruited from Veteran Affairs (VA) sites nationwide, and randomized participants to a self-directed intervention based on the Diabetes Prevention Program with video-based sessions, readings, and regular coaching reminders or usual care. Co-primary outcomes were change in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) and clinical weight in kilograms (kg) from baseline to 12 months post-randomization. Given two primary outcomes, we defined significance at p = 0.025. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This trial randomized 696 participants. Mean age was 56.2 years (SD 12.2), with 19.7% identifying as female. Clinical weights at 12 months were available for 81.9% of intervention and 83.6% of control participants. Unadjusted weight declined 2.1 kg (SD 6.8) in intervention and 0.9 kg (SD 5.9) in control (adjusted between-group difference: -1.1 kg, 95%CI -2.0, -0.1; p = 0.037). FOSQ measures were available at 12 months for 78.2% of intervention and 90.5% of control participants. From baseline to 12 months, unadjusted FOSQ improved 1.4 (SD 2.7) points in intervention and 0.9 (SD 2.9) points in control (adjusted between-group difference: 0.6 points, 95%CI 0.2, 1.0; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among participants with OSA and obesity, a self-directed lifestyle intervention did not improve weight loss and led to improvements in sleep-related quality of life that are of limited clinical importance. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05104450, registered 10/19/2021.

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Tulane University (US), University of Washington (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon