The Case of Long-Term Treatments: How They Unfold and Whether to End Them

In this article, the author considers long-term psychodynamic treatments: How do they develop? In what circumstances are they an outgrowth of treatments that should have ended? When is it beneficial for the patient to continue working with the same therapist for a long period of time? What are indications for return to therapy during the lifecycle? The author gives his definition of long-term treatments, and then reviews pertinent literature on termination, stalemates, and effectiveness of long-term treatments. He describes the therapist’s confronting five clinical situations that raise questions about how and whether to end treatment. He concludes with several guiding principles: (1) paying attention to treatment goals and certain transferences prevents impasses; (2) attending to specific countertransferences prevents avoidance of ending; (3) self-analytic capacity is necessary but not sufficient for readiness to end; and (4) the patient’s forming an intimate relationship with a person other than the therapist facilitates ending.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Psychoanalysis
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.2026.2751856
Primary Topic
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Case of Long-Term Treatments: How They Unfold and Whether to End Them

Andrew I. Smolar
Contemporary Psychoanalysis
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
article

The Case of Long-Term Treatments: How They Unfold and Whether to End Them

Andrew I. Smolar
article en

Abstract

In this article, the author considers long-term psychodynamic treatments: How do they develop? In what circumstances are they an outgrowth of treatments that should have ended? When is it beneficial for the patient to continue working with the same therapist for a long period of time? What are indications for return to therapy during the lifecycle? The author gives his definition of long-term treatments, and then reviews pertinent literature on termination, stalemates, and effectiveness of long-term treatments. He describes the therapist’s confronting five clinical situations that raise questions about how and whether to end treatment. He concludes with several guiding principles: (1) paying attention to treatment goals and certain transferences prevents impasses; (2) attending to specific countertransferences prevents avoidance of ending; (3) self-analytic capacity is necessary but not sufficient for readiness to end; and (4) the patient’s forming an intimate relationship with a person other than the therapist facilitates ending.

Contemporary Psychoanalysis
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Case of Long-Term Treatments: How They Unfold and Whether to End Them — Andrew I. Smolar · Contemporary Psychoanalysis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS