Challenges in meeting the mass transfer demands of high‐density perfusion cultures in single‐use bioreactors

Abstract Increasing protein therapeutics production by adopting intensified perfusion cultures places high demand on the mass transfer capabilities of single‐use bioreactors (SUB). Here, we compare these capabilities for four SUB designs against worst‐case O 2 transfer requirements for supporting Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) perfusion cultures. Impact of power dissipation, gas flow rate, O 2 enrichment, pCO 2 and sparge‐hole size on O 2 and CO 2 mass transfer (OTR and CTR) was characterized. Only one design delivered sufficient O 2 and removed sufficient CO 2 to support a worst‐case cell line at 100 × 10 6 viable cells/mL with a single‐sparger at both 50 and 1000 L scale. Larger‐scale versions of 3 designs were also tested. Performance at a 50‐L scale was not predictive of large‐scale performance (200 or 1000 L) for any design. Changes in the volume and composition of the gas phase during residence in the vessels were characterized. Substantial changes were found. Calculations of predicted culture pCO 2 were performed across the design space, assuming a respiratory quotient of 1. A response surface was constructed to predict culture pCO 2 and used to examine the consequences of various strategies for increasing OTR. Most strategies disproportionately increase OTR relative to CTR, leading to an increase in culture pCO 2 . The implications on SUB design and scale‐up for high‐intensity perfusion cultures are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biotechnology Progress
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.88562
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges in meeting the mass transfer demands of high‐density perfusion cultures in single‐use bioreactors

Anastasia Eftychidou, Marissa R. Dickson, Patrick Romann, Natalia Papalamprou et al.
Biotechnology Progress
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
article

Challenges in meeting the mass transfer demands of high‐density perfusion cultures in single‐use bioreactors

Anastasia Eftychidou, Marissa R. Dickson, Patrick Romann, Natalia Papalamprou, Mikayla Olin, Colin M. Jaques, Joanna D. Kolacz, Anthony M. Beaney, Mauran Mahendra, Anita B. Dabek
article en

Abstract

Abstract Increasing protein therapeutics production by adopting intensified perfusion cultures places high demand on the mass transfer capabilities of single‐use bioreactors (SUB). Here, we compare these capabilities for four SUB designs against worst‐case O 2 transfer requirements for supporting Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) perfusion cultures. Impact of power dissipation, gas flow rate, O 2 enrichment, pCO 2 and sparge‐hole size on O 2 and CO 2 mass transfer (OTR and CTR) was characterized. Only one design delivered sufficient O 2 and removed sufficient CO 2 to support a worst‐case cell line at 100 × 10 6 viable cells/mL with a single‐sparger at both 50 and 1000 L scale. Larger‐scale versions of 3 designs were also tested. Performance at a 50‐L scale was not predictive of large‐scale performance (200 or 1000 L) for any design. Changes in the volume and composition of the gas phase during residence in the vessels were characterized. Substantial changes were found. Calculations of predicted culture pCO 2 were performed across the design space, assuming a respiratory quotient of 1. A response surface was constructed to predict culture pCO 2 and used to examine the consequences of various strategies for increasing OTR. Most strategies disproportionately increase OTR relative to CTR, leading to an increase in culture pCO 2 . The implications on SUB design and scale‐up for high‐intensity perfusion cultures are discussed.

Biotechnology Progress
Lonza (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon