AI-Assisted Radiographic Diagnostic Training in Dental Education: A Randomized Pilot Study of Caries Detection and Periodontitis Classification

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted radiographic tools offer new opportunities for diagnostic training in dental education, but evidence regarding their effect on independent student performance remains limited. This prospective randomized pilot study evaluated whether four weeks of supplementary training with an AI-based radiographic diagnostic-support application improved dental students’ performance in caries detection and periodontitis classification compared with conventional learning materials. Of 140 randomized students, 56 were included in the final analysis (AI-assisted group, n = 25; control group, n = 31). Diagnostic performance was assessed using bitewing-based caries tasks and panoramic-radiograph-based periodontitis classification, and outcomes were additionally analyzed according to study phase. The prespecified primary endpoint, total diagnostic performance across caries and periodontal tasks, was not met: scores did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.251). In secondary analyses, the AI-assisted group achieved numerically higher scores for several outcomes, although the difference in periodontitis extent (localized vs. generalized) was not statistically significant (p = 0.102). In an exploratory adjusted model that was not corrected for multiple comparisons, AI-assisted allocation was associated with better performance for the first caries response position (response position 1; p = 0.026); given the null result for the primary endpoint and the absence of correction for multiple testing, this finding should be regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Study phase significantly influenced periodontitis grade and caries response position 1. Overall, these findings do not demonstrate a significant benefit of AI-assisted radiographic training on the primary outcome, but the isolated adjusted difference in one caries scoring component supports further evaluation of structured, faculty-supported integration of the AI application into undergraduate dental curricula.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app162110750
Primary Topic
Dental Radiography and Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Assisted Radiographic Diagnostic Training in Dental Education: A Randomized Pilot Study of Caries Detection and Periodontitis Classification

Christoph Kurzmann, Dino Tur, Markus Laky, Xiaohui Rausch‐Fan et al.
6 links
Applied Sciences
Dental Radiography and Imaging
article

AI-Assisted Radiographic Diagnostic Training in Dental Education: A Randomized Pilot Study of Caries Detection and Periodontitis Classification

Christoph Kurzmann, Dino Tur, Markus Laky, Xiaohui Rausch‐Fan, Selma Dervisbegovic, Anita Holzinger, Johannes Weimer, Thomas Holzinger, Susanne Tiefenthaller
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted radiographic tools offer new opportunities for diagnostic training in dental education, but evidence regarding their effect on independent student performance remains limited. This prospective randomized pilot study evaluated whether four weeks of supplementary training with an AI-based radiographic diagnostic-support application improved dental students’ performance in caries detection and periodontitis classification compared with conventional learning materials. Of 140 randomized students, 56 were included in the final analysis (AI-assisted group, n = 25; control group, n = 31). Diagnostic performance was assessed using bitewing-based caries tasks and panoramic-radiograph-based periodontitis classification, and outcomes were additionally analyzed according to study phase. The prespecified primary endpoint, total diagnostic performance across caries and periodontal tasks, was not met: scores did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.251). In secondary analyses, the AI-assisted group achieved numerically higher scores for several outcomes, although the difference in periodontitis extent (localized vs. generalized) was not statistically significant (p = 0.102). In an exploratory adjusted model that was not corrected for multiple comparisons, AI-assisted allocation was associated with better performance for the first caries response position (response position 1; p = 0.026); given the null result for the primary endpoint and the absence of correction for multiple testing, this finding should be regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Study phase significantly influenced periodontitis grade and caries response position 1. Overall, these findings do not demonstrate a significant benefit of AI-assisted radiographic training on the primary outcome, but the isolated adjusted difference in one caries scoring component supports further evaluation of structured, faculty-supported integration of the AI application into undergraduate dental curricula.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(21)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Good health and well-being, Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Dental Radiography and Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon