The Ontological Volume of the Multiverse: Definition and Boundaries of the Concept

The article introduces and formalizes the concept of the "ontological volume of the multiverse" (Ω). This concept was used in previous works of the MBM (Models of the Infinite-Dimensional Multiverse) series implicitly — as a "single volume" or "complete set of elements of reality" — but did not receive a rigorous definition. It is shown that Ω is not physical space-time. It is a set of potential elements of reality, from which a certain sample A(S) is activated in each universe, where S is the ontological selector. Formally: Ω = {e₁, e₂, e₃, …} and A(S) = P(S)(Ω). Space-time T(S) is a property of the activated set A(S), not a property of Ω. Each universe has its own space-time; these space-times are not "lying" in a common space but are different ways of connecting the elements of Ω. A comparison is conducted with the concepts of mathematical democracy (Tegmark, Level IV), the logical matrix (SDH), and the infosphere (Floridi). It is shown that Ω is not a mathematical structure, not a logical matrix, and not an informational environment, but an ontological possibility. Mathematical structures, logical conditions, and information are merely types of elements that may be contained in Ω. The connection of Ω with other concepts of the series is determined: the "Universes Here" model (a change of S as a sample from Ω), HPSR (folds as stable configurations of A(S)), and modulational interaction (the external factor X acts on A(S), not on Ω). Open questions are formulated: whether Ω is finite or infinite; whether it can be formalized mathematically (set theory, category theory, topos theory); and how Ω relates to EFOS. The definition of Ω removes the confusion between "place" and "possibility": universes are not located "somewhere," they are different ways of activating the elements of Ω.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23799856
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Ontological Volume of the Multiverse: Definition and Boundaries of the Concept

Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov
4 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
preprint

The Ontological Volume of the Multiverse: Definition and Boundaries of the Concept

Alexander Yourievitch Kotelnikov
preprint en

Abstract

The article introduces and formalizes the concept of the "ontological volume of the multiverse" (Ω). This concept was used in previous works of the MBM (Models of the Infinite-Dimensional Multiverse) series implicitly — as a "single volume" or "complete set of elements of reality" — but did not receive a rigorous definition. It is shown that Ω is not physical space-time. It is a set of potential elements of reality, from which a certain sample A(S) is activated in each universe, where S is the ontological selector. Formally: Ω = {e₁, e₂, e₃, …} and A(S) = P(S)(Ω). Space-time T(S) is a property of the activated set A(S), not a property of Ω. Each universe has its own space-time; these space-times are not "lying" in a common space but are different ways of connecting the elements of Ω. A comparison is conducted with the concepts of mathematical democracy (Tegmark, Level IV), the logical matrix (SDH), and the infosphere (Floridi). It is shown that Ω is not a mathematical structure, not a logical matrix, and not an informational environment, but an ontological possibility. Mathematical structures, logical conditions, and information are merely types of elements that may be contained in Ω. The connection of Ω with other concepts of the series is determined: the "Universes Here" model (a change of S as a sample from Ω), HPSR (folds as stable configurations of A(S)), and modulational interaction (the external factor X acts on A(S), not on Ω). Open questions are formulated: whether Ω is finite or infinite; whether it can be formalized mathematically (set theory, category theory, topos theory); and how Ω relates to EFOS. The definition of Ω removes the confusion between "place" and "possibility": universes are not located "somewhere," they are different ways of activating the elements of Ω.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon