2006 Yogyakarta Synthetic Time History Response Spectrum versus SNI 1726:2019: Building Response

This study investigates how a response spectrum derived from a synthetic acceleration time history representing the 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake compares with the SNI 1726:2019 design spectrum and influences the seismic response of a five-story reinforced concrete building. A 5%-damped event-based spectrum was developed through linear-acceleration analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems and applied alongside the SNI spectrum to a three-dimensional ETABS model for Site Class SD. The developed spectrum reached a peak pseudo spectral acceleration of 1.011 g at 0.34 s, exceeding the SNI plateau of 0.78 g (0.155–0.777 s) by 29.62%. At the building's fundamental period of 1.086 s in X, the developed and SNI spectra gave 0.58 g and 0.56 g, a difference of 3.51%. At 1.385 s in Y, they gave 0.32 g and 0.44 g, a difference of 31.58%. The corresponding differences in unscaled base shear, elastic roof displacement, maximum inter-story drift, and P-Delta stability coefficients were small in X (2.28–3.05%) but greater in Y (27.35–31.34%), where SNI generally produced higher demands. Force scaling brought all cases to 2961.020 kN, although story-level force distributions remained different. All drift and stability checks met the adopted limits. These findings indicate that period-dependent spectral differences are reflected in structural responses but remain specific to the synthetic input and building examined. Further studies using additional ground motions and different building configurations are recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering MAthematics and Computer Science (EMACS) Journal
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21512/emacsjournal.v8i2.16476
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2006 Yogyakarta Synthetic Time History Response Spectrum versus SNI 1726:2019: Building Response

Elvis Saputra, Jafar Jafar, Abdul Rozaq
Engineering MAthematics and Computer Science (EMACS) Journal
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

2006 Yogyakarta Synthetic Time History Response Spectrum versus SNI 1726:2019: Building Response

Elvis Saputra, Jafar Jafar, Abdul Rozaq
article en

Abstract

This study investigates how a response spectrum derived from a synthetic acceleration time history representing the 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake compares with the SNI 1726:2019 design spectrum and influences the seismic response of a five-story reinforced concrete building. A 5%-damped event-based spectrum was developed through linear-acceleration analysis of single-degree-of-freedom systems and applied alongside the SNI spectrum to a three-dimensional ETABS model for Site Class SD. The developed spectrum reached a peak pseudo spectral acceleration of 1.011 g at 0.34 s, exceeding the SNI plateau of 0.78 g (0.155–0.777 s) by 29.62%. At the building's fundamental period of 1.086 s in X, the developed and SNI spectra gave 0.58 g and 0.56 g, a difference of 3.51%. At 1.385 s in Y, they gave 0.32 g and 0.44 g, a difference of 31.58%. The corresponding differences in unscaled base shear, elastic roof displacement, maximum inter-story drift, and P-Delta stability coefficients were small in X (2.28–3.05%) but greater in Y (27.35–31.34%), where SNI generally produced higher demands. Force scaling brought all cases to 2961.020 kN, although story-level force distributions remained different. All drift and stability checks met the adopted limits. These findings indicate that period-dependent spectral differences are reflected in structural responses but remain specific to the synthetic input and building examined. Further studies using additional ground motions and different building configurations are recommended.

Engineering MAthematics and Computer Science (EMACS) JournalVol. 8(2)
Islamic University of Indonesia (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon