Capturing Thought Dynamics: Modeling the Structure of Spontaneous Associations

Human thought unfolds in patterns that vary across individuals; some move fluidly across ideas, whereas others return to narrower or more repetitive paths. Here, we asked whether structural aspects of associative thinking-its breadth, trajectory, and temporal pace-can account for individual differences in repetitive thought styles such as rumination. Participants completed brief free-association tasks, and their responses were quantified using a model trained on large-scale free association data to derive individual structural profiles of associative flow. Across two independent samples, these profiles predicted self-reported measures of rumination and repetitive thinking, with nonlinear models accounting for meaningful inter-individual variation and showing generalization across tasks and datasets. These findings suggest that individual differences in repetitive thought are reflected not only in what people think about but also in how associations are organized and unfold over time. Structural modeling therefore provides a viable approach to characterizing spontaneous cognition through patterns of associative organization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Science
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70275
Primary Topic
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing Thought Dynamics: Modeling the Structure of Spontaneous Associations

Teddy Lazebnik, Moshe Bar, Noa Vardi
3 links
Cognitive Science
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
article

Capturing Thought Dynamics: Modeling the Structure of Spontaneous Associations

Teddy Lazebnik, Moshe Bar, Noa Vardi
article en

Abstract

Human thought unfolds in patterns that vary across individuals; some move fluidly across ideas, whereas others return to narrower or more repetitive paths. Here, we asked whether structural aspects of associative thinking-its breadth, trajectory, and temporal pace-can account for individual differences in repetitive thought styles such as rumination. Participants completed brief free-association tasks, and their responses were quantified using a model trained on large-scale free association data to derive individual structural profiles of associative flow. Across two independent samples, these profiles predicted self-reported measures of rumination and repetitive thinking, with nonlinear models accounting for meaningful inter-individual variation and showing generalization across tasks and datasets. These findings suggest that individual differences in repetitive thought are reflected not only in what people think about but also in how associations are organized and unfold over time. Structural modeling therefore provides a viable approach to characterizing spontaneous cognition through patterns of associative organization.

Cognitive ScienceVol. 50(11)
Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Haifa (IL), Jönköping University (SE)
Israel Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon