Navigating the Kafkaesque: Tracing public service coproduction from three disciplines

This article traces the evolution of public service coproduction from three disciplines: economics, urban theory, and public administration, highlighting the influence of the Ostroms. In addressing the three disciplines, the article explains what broadly united the coproduction literature and the differences that hindered the early development of the concept, providing a synthesization of the scholarship. In doing so, the synthesis emphasizes external outcomes and internal processes of coproduction scholarship by comparing and contrasting the disciplines. The article highlights how the concept is used today. It concludes by suggesting how future research might treat the concept, partitioning coproduction into its “co” and “production” components and the stages of interaction, with a call to urban scholars to revisit the concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Affairs
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2026.2740714
Primary Topic
Public Policy and Administration Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Kafkaesque: Tracing public service coproduction from three disciplines

Brenton Hereford
Journal of Urban Affairs
Public Policy and Administration Research
article

Navigating the Kafkaesque: Tracing public service coproduction from three disciplines

Brenton Hereford
article en

Abstract

This article traces the evolution of public service coproduction from three disciplines: economics, urban theory, and public administration, highlighting the influence of the Ostroms. In addressing the three disciplines, the article explains what broadly united the coproduction literature and the differences that hindered the early development of the concept, providing a synthesization of the scholarship. In doing so, the synthesis emphasizes external outcomes and internal processes of coproduction scholarship by comparing and contrasting the disciplines. The article highlights how the concept is used today. It concludes by suggesting how future research might treat the concept, partitioning coproduction into its “co” and “production” components and the stages of interaction, with a call to urban scholars to revisit the concept.

Journal of Urban Affairs
Murray State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Public Policy and Administration Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon