Feeling Like a Number: How AI’s Neglect of Uniqueness Undermines User Acceptance in Online Medical Consultations

Artificial intelligence (AI) promises greater efficiency and accessibility in online medical consultation (OMC). However, user acceptance, particularly among older adults, remains low. This paradox is not fully explained by cognitive-centric models like the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This study investigates uniqueness neglect as a critical psychological barrier induced by standardized algorithmic interactions. Two between-subjects experiments manipulated consultation type (AI vs. human doctor) to induce differential perception of uniqueness neglect. Results revealed that AI-doctor consultation triggered stronger uniqueness neglect, which reduced acceptance through serial mediators of perceived usefulness and emotional response. The study also provides evidence that activating higher perceived usefulness is an effective intervention. Theoretically, our findings reveal a cognitive-affective serial mechanism extending beyond utilitarian model(s) of resistance to AI services. Practically, OMC platforms should design AI interactions that proactively affirm functional value to compensate for standardized procedure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2752792
Primary Topic
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feeling Like a Number: How AI’s Neglect of Uniqueness Undermines User Acceptance in Online Medical Consultations

Haotian Liu, L. Z. Liao, Xia Hou, Chaohong Shen
2 links
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
article

Feeling Like a Number: How AI’s Neglect of Uniqueness Undermines User Acceptance in Online Medical Consultations

Haotian Liu, L. Z. Liao, Xia Hou, Chaohong Shen
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) promises greater efficiency and accessibility in online medical consultation (OMC). However, user acceptance, particularly among older adults, remains low. This paradox is not fully explained by cognitive-centric models like the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). This study investigates uniqueness neglect as a critical psychological barrier induced by standardized algorithmic interactions. Two between-subjects experiments manipulated consultation type (AI vs. human doctor) to induce differential perception of uniqueness neglect. Results revealed that AI-doctor consultation triggered stronger uniqueness neglect, which reduced acceptance through serial mediators of perceived usefulness and emotional response. The study also provides evidence that activating higher perceived usefulness is an effective intervention. Theoretically, our findings reveal a cognitive-affective serial mechanism extending beyond utilitarian model(s) of resistance to AI services. Practically, OMC platforms should design AI interactions that proactively affirm functional value to compensate for standardized procedure.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
Central South University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Zhongshan Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Feeling Like a Number: How AI’s Neglect of Uniqueness Undermines User Acceptance in Online Medical Consultations — Haotian Liu, L. Z. Liao, et al. · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS