On the Uses of “Queer” in Demography

The phrase “queer demography” appears in conference sessions, scholarly groups, and peer-reviewed journal articles. Critically engaging with terminology matters as the field unfolds. Drawing on precedents from family studies, we map, rather than fix, how “queer” is used in relation to “demography”: queer as a noun (the demography of queer populations); queer as an adjective (demography merged with queer epistemology); and queer as a verb (to queer demography). Rather than settling on a definition of “queer,” we take its resistance to definition and its commitment to unsettling identity categories seriously, reading these uses against demography’s legacy of enumeration and classification and alongside other critical orientations to population studies. We invite those in and outside the field to reflect on what is gained and lost when “queer” is attached to “demography,” and on how current discourse might keep the subfield’s meaning open rather than settled.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/uspe8_v1
Primary Topic
Gender and Feminist Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

On the Uses of “Queer” in Demography

D’Lane R. Compton, Christopher A. Julian, Christina Pao
Gender and Feminist Studies
preprint

On the Uses of “Queer” in Demography

D’Lane R. Compton, Christopher A. Julian, Christina Pao
preprint en

Abstract

The phrase “queer demography” appears in conference sessions, scholarly groups, and peer-reviewed journal articles. Critically engaging with terminology matters as the field unfolds. Drawing on precedents from family studies, we map, rather than fix, how “queer” is used in relation to “demography”: queer as a noun (the demography of queer populations); queer as an adjective (demography merged with queer epistemology); and queer as a verb (to queer demography). Rather than settling on a definition of “queer,” we take its resistance to definition and its commitment to unsettling identity categories seriously, reading these uses against demography’s legacy of enumeration and classification and alongside other critical orientations to population studies. We invite those in and outside the field to reflect on what is gained and lost when “queer” is attached to “demography,” and on how current discourse might keep the subfield’s meaning open rather than settled.

Gender and Feminist Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon