The Museum as a Spatial System: Bodily Movement, Visual Comparison and Memory in Art Viewing

Art viewing in museums inherently relies on physical movement through galleries. While research has begun to examine movement in art perception, it has focused mainly on abstract paintings and small-scale case studies. We investigated how bodily movement, gaze behaviour and memory interact with a mobile-eye-tracking study in Vienna's Leopold Museum (145 visitors viewing 66 paintings across six rooms). The results show that a) although visitors increased their viewing distance for larger paintings, they did not maintain a constant visual angle, b) visitors repositioned themselves mainly laterally in front of paintings, and c) they frequently compared neighbouring artworks by repeating gazes between paintings. Longer viewing times and repeated returns to a painting were associated with better subsequent memory. These findings suggest that the museum's "white cube" is not a neutral backdrop for independent encounters but a spatially organised environment that shapes horizontal exploration as well as visual comparison between adjacent works.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/4kzxd_v1
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Museum as a Spatial System: Bodily Movement, Visual Comparison and Memory in Art Viewing

Raphaël Rosenberg, Jörg Mühlhans, Zoya Dare, Corinna Kühnapfel et al.
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
preprint

The Museum as a Spatial System: Bodily Movement, Visual Comparison and Memory in Art Viewing

Raphaël Rosenberg, Jörg Mühlhans, Zoya Dare, Corinna Kühnapfel, Anna Miscenà, Xingyu Long, Carola Korhummel, Dijana Popovic
preprint en

Abstract

Art viewing in museums inherently relies on physical movement through galleries. While research has begun to examine movement in art perception, it has focused mainly on abstract paintings and small-scale case studies. We investigated how bodily movement, gaze behaviour and memory interact with a mobile-eye-tracking study in Vienna's Leopold Museum (145 visitors viewing 66 paintings across six rooms). The results show that a) although visitors increased their viewing distance for larger paintings, they did not maintain a constant visual angle, b) visitors repositioned themselves mainly laterally in front of paintings, and c) they frequently compared neighbouring artworks by repeating gazes between paintings. Longer viewing times and repeated returns to a painting were associated with better subsequent memory. These findings suggest that the museum's "white cube" is not a neutral backdrop for independent encounters but a spatially organised environment that shapes horizontal exploration as well as visual comparison between adjacent works.

Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
The Museum as a Spatial System: Bodily Movement, Visual Comparison and Memory in Art Viewing — Raphaël Rosenberg, Jörg Mühlhans, et al. · (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS