Restrictions on the Formation and Activities of Political Parties in CIS Member States

The article examines and analyzes restrictions on the creation and activities of political parties in the CIS countries. The author concludes that, in terms of establishing restrictions on the creation and activities of political parties, the CIS countries can be divided into two groups. The first group of states (the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan) adhere to stricter prohibitions and restrictions. The second group of states (Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Moldova, and Ukraine) prefers a more liberal approach. Within the second group of CIS states, states (Moldova and Ukraine) are identified whose approaches to establishing restrictions on the creation and activities of political parties are openly opportunistic and politicized, which ultimately contributes to the coming to power of political forces hostile to the Russian Federation and other CIS states. Based on the positive experience of a number of CIS states, the author formulates proposals for improving Russian legislation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Constitutional and municipal law
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18572/1812-3767-2026-10-60-64
Primary Topic
Law and Political Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restrictions on the Formation and Activities of Political Parties in CIS Member States

A. V. Nechkin
Constitutional and municipal law
Law and Political Science
article

Restrictions on the Formation and Activities of Political Parties in CIS Member States

A. V. Nechkin
article en

Abstract

The article examines and analyzes restrictions on the creation and activities of political parties in the CIS countries. The author concludes that, in terms of establishing restrictions on the creation and activities of political parties, the CIS countries can be divided into two groups. The first group of states (the Russian Federation, the Republic of Belarus, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Azerbaijan) adhere to stricter prohibitions and restrictions. The second group of states (Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Moldova, and Ukraine) prefers a more liberal approach. Within the second group of CIS states, states (Moldova and Ukraine) are identified whose approaches to establishing restrictions on the creation and activities of political parties are openly opportunistic and politicized, which ultimately contributes to the coming to power of political forces hostile to the Russian Federation and other CIS states. Based on the positive experience of a number of CIS states, the author formulates proposals for improving Russian legislation.

Constitutional and municipal law
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Law and Political Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon