The National Disaster-Warning Case Study on heain-core The Earthquake of 28 March 2025 and the Collapsed Building Replaying the Real Event on a 34-Node Simulation, from the First Minute through 45 Days of Rescue to the Prosecutor: with Core Round C6

Abstract The Sagaing Fault earthquake in Myanmar on 28 March 2025 brought down a high-rise under construction in Bangkok's Chatuchak district at 13:20. DDPM's warning went out 82 minutes later, as SMS in rounds [7]. The count of the missing moved between 81 and 117: there was no central list of who was on site, and the site office's records were destroyed with the building [8]. People reported 14,430 cracked buildings in 72 hours [10], and the case reached the prosecutor on 22 July 2026 [8]. This Volume 7 of the case study [1] reports the replay of this event (series E3). The author replayed the event on three time scales (1 hour = 1 minute for the first 3 days, 1 day = 1 minute for the rescue, 1 month = 1 minute for the case) on a 34-node layout with gate-log Micro Nodes at two sites and a building-inspection unit, in two runs: "as it happened" and "with HEAIN". Requirements R19–R27 test the first minute, conflicting sources, records that must survive a destroyed machine, the count of the missing, temporary approvers, public reports and case evidence. The first run on core C5 found the two expected gaps: 4 gate entries were lost with the site's machine, acknowledged before the office had them, and a foreign team's approver right did not end when the team left. Core C6 (f6c46ec) added acknowledgement once the parent has an entry (durability parent) and approver rights that expire (roles.approver_expiry). After the fix the HEAIN run passed 26 of 26 checks with no gap. The first CAP went out in the event's 2nd minute instead of the 85th; all 160 gate entries reached the office with no name lost; the count of the missing matched the simulation's truth at every point; unsafe buildings were closed 0.1 hours after the first report once an engineer confirmed, instead of 26.6; and all 8 case records were kept. Keywords: HEAIN Framework, heain-core, Earthquake 2025, Building Collapse, Event Replay, Durability, RPO, Missing Persons Roster, Approver Expiry, Legal Hold, Chain of Custody

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23820688
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The National Disaster-Warning Case Study on heain-core The Earthquake of 28 March 2025 and the Collapsed Building Replaying the Real Event on a 34-Node Simulation, from the First Minute through 45 Days of Rescue to the Prosecutor: with Core Round C6

JAKKRIT BOONMA
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disaster Management and Resilience
preprint

The National Disaster-Warning Case Study on heain-core The Earthquake of 28 March 2025 and the Collapsed Building Replaying the Real Event on a 34-Node Simulation, from the First Minute through 45 Days of Rescue to the Prosecutor: with Core Round C6

JAKKRIT BOONMA
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract The Sagaing Fault earthquake in Myanmar on 28 March 2025 brought down a high-rise under construction in Bangkok's Chatuchak district at 13:20. DDPM's warning went out 82 minutes later, as SMS in rounds [7]. The count of the missing moved between 81 and 117: there was no central list of who was on site, and the site office's records were destroyed with the building [8]. People reported 14,430 cracked buildings in 72 hours [10], and the case reached the prosecutor on 22 July 2026 [8]. This Volume 7 of the case study [1] reports the replay of this event (series E3). The author replayed the event on three time scales (1 hour = 1 minute for the first 3 days, 1 day = 1 minute for the rescue, 1 month = 1 minute for the case) on a 34-node layout with gate-log Micro Nodes at two sites and a building-inspection unit, in two runs: "as it happened" and "with HEAIN". Requirements R19–R27 test the first minute, conflicting sources, records that must survive a destroyed machine, the count of the missing, temporary approvers, public reports and case evidence. The first run on core C5 found the two expected gaps: 4 gate entries were lost with the site's machine, acknowledged before the office had them, and a foreign team's approver right did not end when the team left. Core C6 (f6c46ec) added acknowledgement once the parent has an entry (durability parent) and approver rights that expire (roles.approver_expiry). After the fix the HEAIN run passed 26 of 26 checks with no gap. The first CAP went out in the event's 2nd minute instead of the 85th; all 160 gate entries reached the office with no name lost; the count of the missing matched the simulation's truth at every point; unsafe buildings were closed 0.1 hours after the first report once an engineer confirmed, instead of 26.6; and all 8 case records were kept. Keywords: HEAIN Framework, heain-core, Earthquake 2025, Building Collapse, Event Replay, Durability, RPO, Missing Persons Roster, Approver Expiry, Legal Hold, Chain of Custody

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Sustainable cities and communities
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon