Training and Experiential Factors Associated With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Referral Readiness Among Psychiatric Providers

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an established treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD); however, barriers remain in clinical practice. This study examined how psychiatric clinicians view TMS and evaluated whether training exposure and prior experience were associated with their readiness to refer patients for treatment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of psychiatric providers in Florida, including attending psychiatrists, psychiatry residents, and psychiatric nurse practitioners. The survey assessed beliefs about TMS effectiveness, comfort discussing and referring the treatment, familiarity with referral processes, and perceived barriers. Responses were dichotomized to reflect endorsement, and group differences were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Ninety-four clinicians completed the survey. Conceptual endorsement of TMS was high, with more than 90% agreeing that it is an effective treatment for depression. Operational readiness was more variable, particularly for referral comfort, counseling confidence, and knowledge of referral pathways. Prior TMS training and prior TMS recommendation experience were associated with greater comfort referring patients, greater confidence counseling patients, and higher awareness of referral steps. Psychiatry residents reported lower referral-pathway awareness than attending psychiatrists. Insurance coverage and treatment costs were frequently reported barriers, and lack of training was a commonly endorsed modifiable barrier. CONCLUSIONS: While psychiatric providers widely accepted TMS conceptually, operational readiness to counsel and refer was more variable. Training exposure and prior TMS recommendation experience were associated with greater confidence, comfort, and familiarity with referral pathways, although causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional design. These findings suggest that efforts to improve utilization should emphasize building operational competence and confidence, along with clearer referral workflows and accessible system-level processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain and Behavior
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.71876
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Training and Experiential Factors Associated With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Referral Readiness Among Psychiatric Providers

Lauren Ferraro, Aneesh Rahangdale, Christopher Wadsworth, Gracyn Wood et al.
1 links
Brain and Behavior
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Training and Experiential Factors Associated With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Referral Readiness Among Psychiatric Providers

Lauren Ferraro, Aneesh Rahangdale, Christopher Wadsworth, Gracyn Wood, Eileen Venable
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an established treatment for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD); however, barriers remain in clinical practice. This study examined how psychiatric clinicians view TMS and evaluated whether training exposure and prior experience were associated with their readiness to refer patients for treatment. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of psychiatric providers in Florida, including attending psychiatrists, psychiatry residents, and psychiatric nurse practitioners. The survey assessed beliefs about TMS effectiveness, comfort discussing and referring the treatment, familiarity with referral processes, and perceived barriers. Responses were dichotomized to reflect endorsement, and group differences were analyzed using chi-square or Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: Ninety-four clinicians completed the survey. Conceptual endorsement of TMS was high, with more than 90% agreeing that it is an effective treatment for depression. Operational readiness was more variable, particularly for referral comfort, counseling confidence, and knowledge of referral pathways. Prior TMS training and prior TMS recommendation experience were associated with greater comfort referring patients, greater confidence counseling patients, and higher awareness of referral steps. Psychiatry residents reported lower referral-pathway awareness than attending psychiatrists. Insurance coverage and treatment costs were frequently reported barriers, and lack of training was a commonly endorsed modifiable barrier. CONCLUSIONS: While psychiatric providers widely accepted TMS conceptually, operational readiness to counsel and refer was more variable. Training exposure and prior TMS recommendation experience were associated with greater confidence, comfort, and familiarity with referral pathways, although causality cannot be inferred from this cross-sectional design. These findings suggest that efforts to improve utilization should emphasize building operational competence and confidence, along with clearer referral workflows and accessible system-level processes.

Brain and BehaviorVol. 16(11)
Florida State University (US), University of Central Florida (US), Boston Children's Hospital (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), HCA Healthcare (US)
HCA Healthcare
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon