The Returns to Government R&D: Evidence from US Appropriations Shocks

Based on a narrative classification of all significant postwar changes in R&D appropriations for five major federal agencies, we find that an increase in nondefense R&D appropriations leads to increases in various measures of innovative activity and higher business-sector productivity in the long run. We structurally estimate the production function elasticity of nondefense government R&D capital using the SP-IV methodology of Lewis and Mertens (2024) and obtain implied returns of 140 to 210 percent over the postwar period. The estimates indicate that government-funded R&D accounts for one-fifth of business-sector TFP growth since WWII and imply substantial underfunding of nondefense R&D. (JEL D24, E23, H50, O31, O33, O38)

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Economic Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20231684
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Returns to Government R&D: Evidence from US Appropriations Shocks

Andrew J. Fieldhouse, Karel Mertens
American Economic Review
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

The Returns to Government R&D: Evidence from US Appropriations Shocks

Andrew J. Fieldhouse, Karel Mertens
article en

Abstract

Based on a narrative classification of all significant postwar changes in R&D appropriations for five major federal agencies, we find that an increase in nondefense R&D appropriations leads to increases in various measures of innovative activity and higher business-sector productivity in the long run. We structurally estimate the production function elasticity of nondefense government R&D capital using the SP-IV methodology of Lewis and Mertens (2024) and obtain implied returns of 140 to 210 percent over the postwar period. The estimates indicate that government-funded R&D accounts for one-fifth of business-sector TFP growth since WWII and imply substantial underfunding of nondefense R&D. (JEL D24, E23, H50, O31, O33, O38)

American Economic ReviewVol. 116(11)
Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon