Capturing experienced invisibility among people with multiple stigmatized identities: The experienced invisibility scale protocol

Invisibility is the experience of not being attended to, remembered, differentiated from others, or given credit for contributions. In the current registered report, we aim to validate the Experienced Invisibility Scale (EIS), a measure designed to capture experiences of invisibility, which are most likely to be experienced by people with multiple stigmatized identities. As proof of concept, we first present a pilot study testing the factor structure of the EIS, in which we found that: 1) a bifactor model ("unheard" and "unnoticed") best represents the structure of experienced invisibility, but that calculating a total score is likely to be sufficient for most purposes, 2) the EIS is most likely to be experienced by those with multiple stigmatized identities, and 3) initial tests of convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity were supported. We then propose three studies to further validate the EIS and its links to social identities. Study 1 will distinguish the EIS from related constructs of social exclusion, objectification, rejection sensitivity, positive and negative affect, and other experiences of discrimination, test the temporal stability of the EIS, and examine relationships with well-being. Study 2 will examine whether the EIS predicts additional outcomes including health, low felt impact, perceived powerlessness, and denial of services or power. Study 3 will test hypotheses that Black women (compared to White women and Black and White men) will report experiencing more invisibility, and will show stronger relationships between invisibility and negative outcomes. We hope this work will aid scholars in better understanding invisibility as a form of discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0361028
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Capturing experienced invisibility among people with multiple stigmatized identities: The experienced invisibility scale protocol

Amanda K. Sesko, Monica Biernat, Alexandra Noelle Fisher
3 links
PLoS ONE
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
article

Capturing experienced invisibility among people with multiple stigmatized identities: The experienced invisibility scale protocol

Amanda K. Sesko, Monica Biernat, Alexandra Noelle Fisher
article en

Abstract

Invisibility is the experience of not being attended to, remembered, differentiated from others, or given credit for contributions. In the current registered report, we aim to validate the Experienced Invisibility Scale (EIS), a measure designed to capture experiences of invisibility, which are most likely to be experienced by people with multiple stigmatized identities. As proof of concept, we first present a pilot study testing the factor structure of the EIS, in which we found that: 1) a bifactor model ("unheard" and "unnoticed") best represents the structure of experienced invisibility, but that calculating a total score is likely to be sufficient for most purposes, 2) the EIS is most likely to be experienced by those with multiple stigmatized identities, and 3) initial tests of convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity were supported. We then propose three studies to further validate the EIS and its links to social identities. Study 1 will distinguish the EIS from related constructs of social exclusion, objectification, rejection sensitivity, positive and negative affect, and other experiences of discrimination, test the temporal stability of the EIS, and examine relationships with well-being. Study 2 will examine whether the EIS predicts additional outcomes including health, low felt impact, perceived powerlessness, and denial of services or power. Study 3 will test hypotheses that Black women (compared to White women and Black and White men) will report experiencing more invisibility, and will show stronger relationships between invisibility and negative outcomes. We hope this work will aid scholars in better understanding invisibility as a form of discrimination.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of Kansas (US), University of Washington Tacoma (US), University of Edinburgh (GB)
University of Washington
Reduced inequalities, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon