Blockchain-Based Content Provenance in News Recommendation: A Scoping Review

Blockchain has been proposed to establish the origin and integrity of news content, and separately to support recommender systems, yet whether provenance information is actually used inside news recommendation and ranking pipelines remains unclear. This scoping review maps the literature on blockchain-based content provenance for news and determines how, and with what evidence, it connects to news recommendation or ranking. The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and its refinements and is reported according to the PRISMA-ScR guideline (Tricco et al., 2018). A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and arXiv was performed on 25 October 2026. Records were charted with an a priori five-level scheme (L0 to L4) describing how provenance status enters a ranking pipeline, and a five-stage scheme for evaluation maturity. The search identified 1,247 records; after removing 312 duplicates, 935 records were screened and 42 assessed in full text, with 17 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The included proposals were conceptual, framework-level, prototype-stage, or reported technical experiments. None of the included blockchain-based studies used provenance status as an input to ranking, filtering, or personalisation (level L0). Adjacent user studies of provenance and disclosure labels (samples of 160 to 6,114 participants) concerned non-blockchain provenance or labels, and one placed labels inside a news-recommender prototype. Recommender-side misinformation research relied on fact-check labels, account reliability, or network position rather than cryptographic provenance. No study from an African setting was identified. The review confirms that provenance and recommendation research have developed in parallel; we propose six design questions to guide future work at their intersection and argue that evaluating provenance-aware ranking is a critical and unfilled research space.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23800063
Primary Topic
Recommender Systems and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blockchain-Based Content Provenance in News Recommendation: A Scoping Review

Augustine Chidiebere Onuora, Taiwo Adisa Oyeniran, George Elechi Christopher
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Recommender Systems and Techniques
article

Blockchain-Based Content Provenance in News Recommendation: A Scoping Review

Augustine Chidiebere Onuora, Taiwo Adisa Oyeniran, George Elechi Christopher
article en

Abstract

Blockchain has been proposed to establish the origin and integrity of news content, and separately to support recommender systems, yet whether provenance information is actually used inside news recommendation and ranking pipelines remains unclear. This scoping review maps the literature on blockchain-based content provenance for news and determines how, and with what evidence, it connects to news recommendation or ranking. The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and its refinements and is reported according to the PRISMA-ScR guideline (Tricco et al., 2018). A systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and arXiv was performed on 25 October 2026. Records were charted with an a priori five-level scheme (L0 to L4) describing how provenance status enters a ranking pipeline, and a five-stage scheme for evaluation maturity. The search identified 1,247 records; after removing 312 duplicates, 935 records were screened and 42 assessed in full text, with 17 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. The included proposals were conceptual, framework-level, prototype-stage, or reported technical experiments. None of the included blockchain-based studies used provenance status as an input to ranking, filtering, or personalisation (level L0). Adjacent user studies of provenance and disclosure labels (samples of 160 to 6,114 participants) concerned non-blockchain provenance or labels, and one placed labels inside a news-recommender prototype. Recommender-side misinformation research relied on fact-check labels, account reliability, or network position rather than cryptographic provenance. No study from an African setting was identified. The review confirms that provenance and recommendation research have developed in parallel; we propose six design questions to guide future work at their intersection and argue that evaluating provenance-aware ranking is a critical and unfilled research space.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Akanu Ibiam, Federal Polytechnic Unwana (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Recommender Systems and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon